Is the S Matrix Unitary in One-Dimensional Scattering Problems?

jaobyccdee
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known
A general one dimensional scattering problem could be characterized by an
(arbitrary) potential V (x) which is localized by the requirement that V (x) = 0
for |x|> a. Assume that the wave-function is
ψ (x) =

Ae^(ikx) + Be^(-ikx) x < -a
Ce^(ikx) + De^(-ikx) x > a
Relating the \outgoing" waves to the \incoming" waves by the matrix equation

C=S11A+ S12B
B=S21A+ S22D


show that
|S11|^2 + |S21|^2 = 1
|S12|^2 + |S22|^2 = 1
S11S12* + S21S22* = 0
Use this to show that the S matrix is unitary.

Homework Equations


I don't understand why C=S11A+S12B or B=S21A+S22D



The Attempt at a Solution


I calculate the flux for the incoming beam and the outgoing beam and set them equal, i get 2A^2 ik-2ikB^2=2C^2ik-2D^2ik i don't see how C and B can be expressed with only two other variables.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jaobyccdee said:
I don't understand why C=S11A+S12B or B=S21A+S22D

You can derive these conditions by matching both the wavefunction and its derivative at x=a (we generally require these functions to be continuous everywhere, when possible).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top