Is the tangential acceleration component always zero(wheel?)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the tangential acceleration of a wheel rolling down a hill without slipping. Participants explore the relationship between the wheel's motion, its velocity at the contact point, and the implications for tangential acceleration. The scope includes theoretical reasoning, mathematical derivations, and application to dynamics problems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that if the contact point of a wheel has zero velocity, then the tangential acceleration at that point must also be zero.
  • Others challenge this assertion, noting that a momentarily zero velocity does not imply zero tangential acceleration, suggesting that the derivative of a function can be non-zero even at a point where the function itself is zero.
  • A participant describes their approach to modeling the wheel's motion using parametric equations and derivatives, concluding that the tangential acceleration is zero at a specific point when the wheel has rotated 180 degrees.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about the applicability of their calculus knowledge to the problem and reflects on a previous exam question that indicated the tangential component of acceleration was zero.
  • Further calculations are presented, where a participant attempts to derive the acceleration components while considering the effects of angular acceleration due to gravity, leading to a complex expression that raises questions about the validity of their assumptions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the tangential acceleration is always zero at the contact point of the wheel. Multiple competing views are presented, with some arguing for zero tangential acceleration and others providing counterarguments based on mathematical reasoning.

Contextual Notes

The discussion involves complex mathematical derivations and assumptions about the wheel's motion, including the effects of gravity and angular acceleration. Some participants express uncertainty regarding the implications of their calculations and the relevance of different coordinate systems.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students studying dynamics, particularly those interested in the motion of rolling objects and the concepts of tangential and normal acceleration.

x86
Gold Member
Messages
256
Reaction score
18
If a wheel is rolling down a hill without slipping then we know the contact point has zero velocity.

Is it also true that the tangential acceleration of this point is zero too?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you try computing it?
 
Orodruin said:
Why don't you try computing it?

Ok well,

The velocity at point A is zero, V_A = 0

So d(V_A)/dt = (a_t)_A = 0

Therefore the tangential acceleration is zero at this instant.

Is this correct? It is kind of weird, because then how would the wheel continue turning?
 
No, it is not correct. The velocity is on momentarily zero and the derivative of a function which is zero at a given point may still be non-zero (take the derivative of x with respect to x at x = 0 for example).

Can you describe how the position of a given point on the wheel (in a reasonable coordinate system) depends on time?
 
Orodruin said:
No, it is not correct. The velocity is on momentarily zero and the derivative of a function which is zero at a given point may still be non-zero (take the derivative of x with respect to x at x = 0 for example).

Can you describe how the position of a given point on the wheel (in a reasonable coordinate system) depends on time?

I don't know any physics theory. I'm taking a dynamics course in engineering and its really applied, but this concept is one that I'm curious about because on a previous exam there was a question about a wheel rolling down a hill without slipping, and there was a point P that connects the ground and wheel. The question was what was the acceleration of the point P, and the answer only used the normal component of the wheel, and said the tangent component was 0.

Altough, I just wrote my calculus 2 final exam so I'm going to try and do some calculus and to give your question a try using what I know, I don't think the n-t coordinate system will be helpful because it has nothing to do with position.

But I think I can describe the position with parametric equations. If we start from the top of the wheel , then we know its coordinates are x = rsinwt, y = rcoswt (w is angular velocity)

So taking the derivatives

x' = wrcoswt
y' = -wrsinwt

x'' = -w^2rsinwt
y'' = -w^2rcoswt

When the top point of the wheel touches the ground, then it has rotated 180 degrees, so (wt) = pi

Then x'' = 0 and y'' = rw^2

Meaning that this point P is only moving up at this exact point

Since in n-t coordinate system, "up" is y which is n, "left/right" is x which is t

But our "left/right" is 0. So the only acceleration is "up" So this has to mean there is no tangential acceleration, only normal

This conclusion agrees with the exam solution too, and I'm pretty confident with it.

Even though we'd have some new term inside our sin/cos wave changing the angular velocity (due to a gravity component), I'm going to say its the same even when we have a hill, just because the exam answer sort of implied this.

EDIT: But to do some further calculus, if its rolling down a hill and accelerating without slipping

r is radius, p is the angular acceleration due to gravity

x = rsin[ (w + pt)t ] = rsin[ wt + pt^2 ]
y = rcos[ (w + pt)t ] = rcos[ wt + pt^2 ]

x' = [ wt + pt^2 ]' rcos[ wt + pt^2 ] = wrcos[ wt + pt^2 ] + 2ptrcos[ wt + pt^2 ]
y' = [ wt + pt^2 ]' -rsin[ wt + pt^2 ] = -wtrsin[ wt + pt^2 ] - 2ptrsin[ wt + pt^2 ]

Wow, this is getting messy fast. I'm going to assume y'' is nonzero and only calculate x''

x'' = -wr(w+2pt)sin[ wt + pt^2 ] + 2prcos[ wt + pt^2 ] - 2ptrsin[ wt + pt^2 ]

When [ wt + pt^2 ] = pi

x'' = 0 + 2pr - 0

Ok, x is nonzero, it shouldn't be... because the normal component is tangent to the hill.

So I'm just going to assume the tangent component is zero based off of the exam answer
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K