Is the textbook wrong or am I?

  • Thread starter Thread starter drewdiddy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Textbook
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a vertical spring and the speed it can impart to a ball when released. The initial calculations yield a velocity of 7.68 m/s, while the textbook states it should be 7.47 m/s. Participants clarify that the conservation of energy equation must account for gravitational potential energy, leading to the conclusion that the textbook's answer is correct. One participant acknowledges the error in their terminology regarding vertical distance. Ultimately, the consensus is that the textbook's calculation is accurate.
drewdiddy
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A vertical spring (ignore its mass), whose spring constant is 875 N/m is attached to a table and is compressed down by .160 m. (a) What upward speed can it give to a .380 kg ball when released?


Homework Equations



Conservation of Energy using 1/2 k x^2 for Uspring.

The Attempt at a Solution



I get 7.68 m/s for the velocity and the book gets 7.47 m/s. Wanted to see who was right and if I'm doing something wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
drewdiddy said:

Homework Statement



A vertical spring (ignore its mass), whose spring constant is 875 N/m is attached to a table and is compressed down by .160 m. (a) What upward speed can it give to a .380 kg ball when released?


Homework Equations



Conservation of Energy using 1/2 k x^2 for Uspring.

The Attempt at a Solution



I get 7.68 m/s for the velocity and the book gets 7.47 m/s. Wanted to see who was right and if I'm doing something wrong.

"Upward" also means against gravity. You should also figure as an adjustment the m*g*h over the displacement of the acceleration.
 
So you're saying you got the book's answer?

I used the conservation of energy subbing values for spring and taking into account y=0 when crossing the original spring length. I'm quite sure I have the right answer and the book's is wrong but I just want to verify.
 
drewdiddy said:
So you're saying you got the book's answer?

I used the conservation of energy subbing values for spring and taking into account y=0 when crossing the original spring length. I'm quite sure I have the right answer and the book's is wrong but I just want to verify.

I'm just saying that

mv2/2 = kx2/2 - m*g*x
 
Last edited:
You are wrong, your book is right, Pion is right: (except I would not use both "h" and "x", there is only one vertical distance in the problem)
 
borgwal said:
You are wrong, your book is right, Pion is right: (except I would not use both "h" and "x", there is only one vertical distance in the problem)

Thanks for the catch. Of course h and x are the same.

I edited the previous post to be correct now.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top