Is the Tracking Error of the Telescopic Scope Mount a Dealbreaker?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chronos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scope
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the tracking error of a telescopic scope mount and its impact on photography. Users note that while the optics of the scope are excellent, the mount may limit astrophotography, particularly for stacking images. For planetary imaging, the tracking accuracy is less critical, making the setup more viable for casual use. Concerns are raised about the EQ5 mount's periodic error, which remains problematic even on a permanent pier. Ultimately, the suitability of the mount depends on the intended use, with some users finding it acceptable for visual observation but challenging for serious imaging.
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
11,420
Reaction score
751
Any first hand reviews on this scope?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
My telescope is the same C11 OTA on a much beefier mount. If you plan to take pictures, the mount will be a serious limitation, but if not you should be ok. The optics, however, are excellent.
 
I would like to take some pics, stacking if necessary. I saw this scope for 1999 on an equatorial mount. Was intrigued. If you like it, that is all I need to know.
 
Will the the eq5 mount be adequate on a permanent pier?
 
The tracking error (periodic error) of that mount is the real killer - a pier doesn't help that.
 

Thread 'Does it make sense to build new radio telescopes?'

TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
View full post »
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'

Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'

This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
View full post »

Thread 'Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos'

This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
View full post »

Similar threads

B More scope refurbishments or start new?
Replies
7
Views
2K
B Considering a budget observatory
Replies
10
Views
2K
Stargazing Fixing declination runaway on a Meade LX200 telescope
Replies
6
Views
4K
Is the Celestron Omni XLT 120 Refractor Telescope worth the investment?
Replies
7
Views
2K
Stargazing The Moon through my El Crapo Telescope
Replies
18
Views
4K
B Help w/ repairing/refurbishing an equatorial mount
Replies
11
Views
2K
Stargazing Protecting Optics (not eyes) During Solar Observing
Replies
20
Views
30K
Is a Used Telescope a Good Choice for a Beginner Astronomer?
Replies
5
Views
3K
Stargazing Telescope to see up close to nebulas and galaxies
Replies
5
Views
3K
Stargazing Dealing with Dust and Condensation on Telescope Mirrors
Replies
7
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top