Is There a Canonical Transformation for x = 2qa/sin(T) and p = 2qa.cos(T)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter photomagnetic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transformations
photomagnetic
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that x = 2qa/sin(T) and p = 2qa.cos(T) is a canonical transformation
into new coordinates T and momentum q.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


It looks easy, I've tried matrix/jacobi method, and symplectic method. But these two seem to be not canonical. Am I missing something? The question doesn't give anything else. Do I have to find a generating function to prove that they are canonical? But then it'd would be silly, because the professor is very clear about these things. If he wanted to see a F generating function he would have said so.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Clue: do you have any theorems that provide necessary and sufficient conditions for a transformation to be canonical?
 
I re-correct myself, the prof. is an jerk. He hadn't mentioned that we had to use a generating function. now I got it. thanks anyway.
 
That's not nice. I'm sure your prof is a very nice fellow.

Incidentally, there are several different methods that you might have used to show that the given transformation is canonical.
 
Yeah not telling which method we "must" use is not nice either.
Anyway after trying to do 3 hws each week, and spending a huge chunk of time,
people can get mad. Also no need to be politically correct here.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top