Is There Missing Information in This Simple Harmonic Motion Problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a simple harmonic motion problem where the acceleration and elongation are given, but the necessary parameters to find angular frequency, velocity, and acceleration at t=1s are unclear. The original poster struggles with the lack of information regarding amplitude and phase angle, questioning if critical data is missing. Suggestions include modeling the motion as a mass on a spring and considering energy equations, although the poster notes that they are not expected to know about energy yet. Multiple sets of parameters could fit the given data, but they lead to different velocity outcomes at t=1s. Ultimately, it is concluded that the problem may not provide sufficient data for the expected skill level.
zacc
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An object moving with harmonic motion has an acceleration of -2 m/s^2 when the elongation is 0.5 m. Determine the angular frequency and the velocity and acceleration for t=1s.

Homework Equations



a=-ω2x (1)
x=Acos(ωt+θ) (2)
a=-Aω2cos(ωt+θ) (3)

The Attempt at a Solution



I found ω using equation (1). My problem is from this point on. To find the velocity and acceleration for t=1s I need to find the value of A and θ. However, I cannot do so because I don't know the time for which a=-2m/s2 or x=0.5m. I believe I would have to assume that t=0 for the data given but I don't like to do that as it is not stated in the problem. So, my question is, am I missing something obvious here or is there missing information in the statement? Thanks a lot for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know more equations than that - model the motion as a mass on a spring.
You need to get the velocity etc as a function of position not time.
Hint: look at the energy.
 
Hi Simon: Not sure what you mean. First, problem does not state the mass. Second, the equations for kinetic and potential energy both depend on the amplitude which I don't think I can find with the given data. Incidentally, at this point in the curriculum I am not supposed to know about energy yet. In any case, I still think that the problem is not given me enough data to find a solution. Thanks for the suggestions though.
 
It looks undetermined, if this is the full text of the problem. Even if you assume that the values are for t=0.

When in this sort of doubt you can try to see if multiple sets of unknown parameters are compatible with the given data.

For example, you can take
A= 1m and θ = π/3
or
A=0.5 m and θ =0.

Both sets of parameters will give you the x=0.5 m and a=-2 m/s^2 at t=0.
But the values for v(1s) will be different.
 
zacc said:
Hi Simon: Not sure what you mean.
... about what?
First, problem does not state the mass.
... it may not matter. The mass may cancel out.

Second, the equations for kinetic and potential energy both depend on the amplitude which I don't think I can find with the given data.
You may end up with several equations in which you have several unknowns - like mass and amplitude and initial phase.
You solve them as simultaneous equations.

This is often the case when it looks like there is not enough information.

Incidentally, at this point in the curriculum I am not supposed to know about energy yet. In any case, I still think that the problem is not given me enough data to find a solution. Thanks for the suggestions though.
If that's the case them probably not enough data for your expected skill level.
It is likely, then, that the extra information is assumed in the framework that SHM has been explained to you in class.

i.e. maybe 0.5m is intended to be the initial displacement - the object is thus released from rest at x=+0.5.

(It seems odd to do SHM before conservation of energy and energy stored in a spring.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top