I Is There Really Only One Electron Traveling Through Time?

PhysicsCheeser
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I was reading through a thread and read someone say that there is really only one electron traveling through time which is why all electrons we see are the same. IS this an accurate claim? if so, where does it come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
so its not even a theory? it was just left as a postulate? has anyone done anything to try and rove this?
 
It is an English description of an aspect of a theory (quantum field theory) that is at best misleading.

No, it is not a theory.
What do you mean by "not even"? A theory is the best science can achieve.
 
  • Like
Likes stoomart and vanhees71
there is no theory that there is only one electron, it was just speculated by Feynman and Wheeler. This is what I understood from the article rootone posted.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top