Is There Scientific Consensus on Human-Induced Global Warming?

AI Thread Summary
The scientific community remains divided on the certainty of conclusions regarding global warming, particularly concerning human influence on climate and the trajectory of global temperatures this century. Two key references provide foundational insights: the IPCC Third Assessment Report and a review article titled "Global Warming: The Balance of Evidence and Its Policy Implications." Both documents have been updated, reflecting advancements in climate science. The latest IPCC report, available on their website, includes a comprehensive review of the physical science basis, supplemented by a technical summary and FAQ for easier navigation. Additionally, a 2007 update to the 2003 review article addresses the evolving state of the controversy surrounding climate change, highlighting significant progress on previously contentious issues.
Monique
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,211
Reaction score
68
There is controversy about how certain the scientific community is of its conclusions about global warming: whether humans are influencing the climate and whether global temperatures will continue to rise rapidly in this century.

There are two reviews that can be used as a reference for information.

This thread is locked since it is meant as a reference point. Contact me if you want to make an addition.
 
Last edited:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Contributed by Sylas:

Since these two reviews were published, both have now been given in updated forms. The differences give a useful insight into how climate science is progressing, and the new versions are more up to date.
  • The Physical Science Basis reviews the underlying science of the fourth IPCC assessment report, which is now available at the ipcc site. It is very long, but there is a technical summary and an FAQ which can help as a guide.
  • The second reference above provides a "Review of the Current State-of-the-Controversy". In the light of significant progress on the major issues of controversy identified in that 2003 review, the author published an update in 2007. It is:
    Keller (2007) http://www.thescientificworld.com/headeradmin/upload/2007.03.91.pdf
    TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 7, 381–399. DOI 10.1100/tsw.2007.91
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
On August 10, 2025, there was a massive landslide on the eastern side of Tracy Arm fjord. Although some sources mention 1000 ft tsunami, that height represents the run-up on the sides of the fjord. Technically it was a seiche. Early View of Tracy Arm Landslide Features Tsunami-causing slide was largest in decade, earthquake center finds https://www.gi.alaska.edu/news/tsunami-causing-slide-was-largest-decade-earthquake-center-finds...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
17K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
180
Views
53K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
75
Views
21K
Replies
184
Views
47K
Back
Top