Is this a parallel circuit with non-parallel resistors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Coco12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether a circuit with two pathways for current flow can still be classified as a parallel circuit if the resistors are not physically arranged in parallel. It emphasizes that the electrical connections, rather than the physical orientation of the resistors, determine the classification of the circuit. Participants debate the definitions of parallel and series connections, highlighting that resistors are in parallel if they connect to the same two nodes. The conversation also explores the implications of resistor placement on current flow and circuit behavior. Ultimately, understanding the electrical connections is crucial for accurately defining the circuit type.
Coco12
Messages
272
Reaction score
0
Question:
Is this a parallel circurt?

ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1389730789.854754.jpg

Revelant equations:
None required

Attempt at solution:
I know that a parallel circurt has more than one pathway for the current to flow and has resistors parallel to each other. However in both of the pictures shown, there are two parallel paths but the resistors are not parallel. Is that still considered a parallel circurt then?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Coco12 said:
Question:
Is this a parallel circurt?

View attachment 65611
Relevant equations:
None required

Attempt at solution:
I know that a parallel circuit has more than one pathway for the current to flow and has resistors parallel to each other. However in both of the pictures shown, there are two parallel paths but the resistors are not parallel. Is that still considered a parallel circuit then?
Why would the physical orientation of the resistors matter? It's the electrical connections that matter.
 
SammyS said:
Why would the physical orientation of the resistors matter? It's the electrical connections that matter.
It doesn't matter? Then in the 2 pictures, which one would not be?
 
Coco12 said:
It doesn't matter? Then in the 2 pictures, which one would not be?
Do you have a more explicit definition for two resistors to be in parallel -- or in series, for that matter?
 
You're supposed to tell us that. If two resistors are in parallel, they're connected to the same two nodes in the circuit. For which of the circuits does this hold true?
 
vela said:
You're supposed to tell us that. If two resistors are in parallel, they're connected to the same two nodes in the circuit. For which of the circuits does this hold true?
Same two nodes...
 
Coco12 said:
Same two nodes...
I think maybe it would be the first one because the second has resistors in the same line, which would be similar to a series?
 
As SammyS said, it's the electrical connections that matter, not how the resistors are drawn.
 
vela said:
As SammyS said, it's the electrical connections that matter, not how the resistors are drawn.
I'm not sure I know what you mean by that.
 
  • #10
vela said:
As SammyS said, it's the electrical connections that matter, not how the resistors are drawn.
Nodes means the point where the current splits right? In the first diagram, the the resistor shares one node with the other. The second one also shares one node.
 
  • #11
vela said:
As SammyS said, it's the electrical connections that matter, not how the resistors are drawn.
Is it that in order for it to be a parallel circurt, the electrons from a branch cannot meet the load from the other, therefore the second diagram is not parallel
 
  • #12
Circuit B is definitely interesting in the way its drawn, but what if you were to draw a resister in Circuit B where the resistor is in Circuit A, and label it 0 Ohms. Does that help change your understanding of the circuit? Can an electron find a way to move from the voltage source through both resistors and back in Circuit B? Circuit A?
 
Back
Top