Is This Electromagnetism Homework Attempt Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vip_uae
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a student's attempts to solve electromagnetism homework questions. For question (a), the student drew a circle with a positive sign and arrows pointing outward, which is correct for depicting electric field lines from a positively charged shell. In question (b), the student defined an equipotential surface as one with constant voltage and noted that electric field lines are perpendicular to these surfaces. For question (c), the student created three concentric circles labeled with increasing potential, but there was confusion regarding the direction of arrows. Overall, the student seeks validation for their answers and clarification on the representation of equipotential surfaces.
vip_uae
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Help me With ELECTROMAGNETISIM pleasezzz

Hello i need some help with my Electromagnetism H.W

these are the questions .. i don't get them at all but can you check for me my attempts on the questions :)..

(a) Draw a schematic diagram of electric field lines generated by a positively
charged spherical metallic shell in air.

---- What i did is that i made a circle and place a + sign on it and place arrows going out of it .. is that right?

(b) State what is meant by the term “equipotential surface”. Define the
geometrical relationship between the directions of electric field lines and
equipotential surfaces.

----An equipotential surface is a surface on which the potential, or voltage, is constant. Electric field lines are always perpendicular to these surfaces(c) In the case of the charged metallic shell described in Q(a), show
schematically three equipotential surfaces and label them in order of
increasing potential (V1>V2>V3).----- what i did over here is made three circles and each circle is bigger than the other and they are above each other having V3 the bigger circle and arrows pointing towards the smaller circles..

Plzzz help me out thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


all those answers seem correct to me, I am not exactly sure what you mean by "arrows pointing towards the smaller circles" but your explanations look right.
 


Sorry it took me a while to answer back.. emmm what i meant by the circles is like u have 3 circles above each other and they are bigger than each other sooo the bigger circle arrows pointing towards the smaller circle and the second smaller circle arrows are pointing towards the other smaller circle
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top