Is this question possible without having learnt derivatives?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ottoic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivatives
ottoic
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
nvm got it
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ottoic said:
-2x+b=3x^2+4x-1
0=3x^2+6x-1-b


Right, well when you reach here, you will get

3x^2+6x-(1+b)=0

Now if we solve for x using the quadratic equation we'll get

x=\frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}

If the line intersects the curve, you'll get two real values for x right? (in the form a±b)

Now for a tangent, the line intersects the curve once. So what condition should you put so that in the quadratic formula above, to get only value for x?
 
Suggestion (without working it all out): Look for a value of b such that the line intersects the parabola at one point.

From where you were:

0=3x^2+6x-1-b

Isolate b:

b = 3x^2+6x-1

Solve the quadratic equation for b. Does that work?
 
rphenry said:
Suggestion (without working it all out): Look for a value of b such that the line intersects the parabola at one point.

From where you were:

0=3x^2+6x-1-b

Isolate b:

b = 3x^2+6x-1

Solve the quadratic equation for b. Does that work?
No, tha'ts not a quadratic equation "for b"- and it is already solved for b.

rockfreak667 suggested the right method: the equation ax^2+ bx+ c= 0 has a single solution if and only if the "discriminant", b^2- 4ac= 0[/math]. For this equation that would be 36+ 12(b+1)= 0. Solve <b>that</b> equation for b.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top