Is this the correct way to estimate the natural lifetime of an atomic state?

doomhalo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I've just been having a little trouble with this short question from a past exam paper...

Homework Statement


"An atomic state has a dominant decay mode which produces an emission line of wavelength 6 \times 10^{-7} m and natural width 10^{-13} m. Estimate it's natural lifetime.

Homework Equations


\Delta E \Delta T \geq \frac{\hbar}{2}
E = \frac{hc}{\lambda}

The Attempt at a Solution



\tau \approx \frac{\hbar}{2E}
\tau \approx \frac{\lambda}{4\pi c} \approx 1.59 \times 10^{-16}

I was just wondering if this seemed right? I'm concerned that I've not used the natural width provided in the question but I'm not sure whether it's a case of I've a) Missed a relevant equation, or b) I've used the equations I do have wrong.

Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The mistake here is that you used:\Delta E = \Delta \lambda

What is ##\Delta E## in terms of ##\lambda## and ##\Delta \lambda##?
 
unscientific said:
The mistake here is that you used:\Delta E = \Delta \lambda

What is ##\Delta E## in terms of ##\lambda## and ##\Delta \lambda##?

Ah I see, so
\Delta E = \frac{hc}{\lambda^2} \Delta\lambda

And then

\tau \approx \frac{\lambda^2}{4\pi c \Delta\lambda}

?

Thank you very much!
 
Yes that's right. That gives a reasonable answer. (0.3s I think)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top