Isomorphic direct product cyclic groups

blahblah8724
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Help! For p prime I need to show that

C_{p^2} \ncong C_p \times C_p

where C_p is the cyclic group of order p.



But I've realized I don't actually understand how a group with single elements can be isomorphic to a group with ordered pairs!


Any hints to get me started?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
blahblah8724 said:
Help! For p prime I need to show that

C_{p^2} \ncong C_p \times C_p

where C_p is the cyclic group of order p.

What possible orders do elements in C_{p^2} have. Are these order compatible with the elements in C_p\times C_p?

But I've realized I don't actually understand how a group with single elements can be isomorphic to a group with ordered pairs!

It certainly is possible. For example, we have C_6\cong C_2\times C_3. Indeed, if we use additive notation (C_6=\{0,1,2,3,4,5\}), then

f:C_6\rightarrow C_2\times C_3

by f(0)=(0,0), f(1)=(1,1), f(2)=(0,2), f(3)=(1,0), f(4)=(0,1), f(5)=(1,2) is an isomorphism.
 
But surely if again we use additive notatoin with C_9=\{0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8\} then f:C_9 \to C_3 \times C_3 with
f(0) = (0,0), f(1) = (0,1), f(2) = (0,2), f(3) = (1,0), f(4) = (1,1), f(5) = (1,2), f(6) = (2,0),
f(7) = (2,1), f(8) = (2,2) is as isomorphism?
 
blahblah8724 said:
But surely if again we use additive notatoin with C_9=\{0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8\} then f:C_9 \to C_3 \times C_3 with
f(0) = (0,0), f(1) = (0,1), f(2) = (0,2), f(3) = (1,0), f(4) = (1,1), f(5) = (1,2), f(6) = (2,0),
f(7) = (2,1), f(8) = (2,2) is as isomorphism?

No. f(2+2)=f(4)=(1,1). But f(2+2)=f(2)+f(2)=(0,2)+(0,2)=(0,1). So it's not a homomorphism.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top