Isosceles Triangle Geometry Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bashyboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry Triangle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving for the sides of an isosceles triangle represented by the expressions x + 5, 3x + 13, and 4x + 11. Participants explored different configurations by setting pairs of sides equal to each other to find possible values for x. The valid solutions identified were x = 2 and x = -2, with x = -4 yielding a negative side length, which is not feasible for a triangle. The importance of checking the side lengths after calculating x was emphasized to ensure they form a valid triangle. Ultimately, the two viable solutions correspond to two possible triangles.
Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


The measure of the sides of an isosceles triangle are represented by x + 5, 3x +13, and 4x + 11. What are the measures of the sides? Two answers are possible.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Well, I set up three different triangles, to account for the different placements of the sides; but I only came up with one solution. Where is the second solution coming from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Two of those sides must be equal, right? Pick two of them, set them equal and find x. There are actually three different ways to do that. You'll find one value of x doesn't work.
 
Well, I did do that, and I got -8, -6, and 2.
 
Bashyboy said:
Well, I did do that, and I got -8, -6, and 2.

Are those the x values? How did you get -8 and -6? I did get x=2 for one pair.
 
Oh! terribly sorry: I meant to write -4 and -3. And I found them by creating three different triangles, each case having its side equal to on of the others. For instance, I said a = x + 5,
b = 3x + 13, and c = 4x + 11; then I arbitrarily assigned a and b to be the equivalent sides and set them equal to each other and solved for x. Then, in the second case, I said a = x + 5, but this time I set b = 4x + 11; and once again, I said that a and b were the sides of the isosceles triangle that were equal and consequently set them equal to each other and solved for x. I followed the same procedure for the third case.
 
Bashyboy said:
Oh! terribly sorry: I meant to write -4 and -3. And I found them by creating three different triangles, each case having its side equal to on of the others. For instance, I said a = x + 5,
b = 3x + 13, and c = 4x + 11; then I arbitrarily assigned a and b to be the equivalent sides and set them equal to each other and solved for x. Then, in the second case, I said a = x + 5, but this time I set b = 4x + 11; and once again, I said that a and b were the sides of the isosceles triangle that were equal and consequently set them equal to each other and solved for x. I followed the same procedure for the third case.

And which one of those gave you x=(-3)? I'm ok with x=2 and x=(-4).
 
Blimey, I erred once again; the -3 should be a -2, and I found it by setting x + 5 = 4x + 11
 
Bashyboy said:
Blimey, I erred once again; the -3 should be a -2, and I found it by setting x + 5 = 4x + 11

Ok, so you've got x=2, -2 or -4. Which of those correspond to real triangles? Check what the side lengths are in each case.
 
Oh, okay, I see: I never plugged the values back into each expression; as soon as I saw the negative value, I completely dismissed it, thinking that you can't have a negative measurement. So, the two answers should be 2 and -2? and this corresponds to two possible triangles?
 
  • #10
Bashyboy said:
Oh, okay, I see: I never plugged the values back into each expression; as soon as I saw the negative value, I completely dismissed it, thinking that you can't have a negative measurement. So, the two answers should be 2 and -2? and this corresponds to two possible triangles?

Yes, x=(-4) gives you a side with negative length. Can't have that.
 
  • #11
Okay, thank you so very much for your time and help.
 
Back
Top