Issue calculating the velocity of pions from K-meson decay

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the velocity of pions resulting from K-meson decay using measurements from hydrogen bubble chamber tracks. The user has derived momenta for the pions but struggles with determining their total energy to apply a gamma correction for speed. They realize a mistake in their calculations regarding the conversion of momentum from MeV/c to velocity, questioning the correct use of relativistic equations. The conversation highlights the importance of using the correct relationships between energy, momentum, and mass, particularly in the context of relativistic physics. Ultimately, the user seeks clarification on the proper conversion between mass and energy units while addressing their calculation errors.
mountevans
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We were supplied with several images of hydrogen bubble chamber tracks, from which we measured the length of the (invisible) K0 track, angles of departure from the K0 meson's track and curvature. As a way to limit the amount of data we're talking about, I'll only discuss the first particle. The length of the K0's track was 0.016 m, the radius of curvature of the π+ was 0.65 m, the π- 0.50 m, the angles of departure (π+-) were 44 and 24 degrees respectively, and the magnetic field was 1.4 Teslas.

The momentum of the positive k meson tracks is given as 535 MeV/c. Rest mass of positive and negative pions is 139.57 MeV/c2. c = 3*108 m/s, of course.

Homework Equations


p = q*r*B
T = 1/2 mv2
γ = 1/√(1-v2/c2)
p [in MeV/c] = 3 ∗ 102 ∗ r [in m] ∗ B [in T]
F = mv2/r

The Attempt at a Solution


Using the formula for p above, 3 ∗ 102 * (0.65 m) * (1.4 T), I get 382.6 MeV/c for the π+ and 294.3 MeV/c for the π- total momenta.

However, I'm now at the step where I think I need to determine the total energy of the pions so I can apply a gamma correction to their speed. When I take the above equations,

F = mv2/r and p = mv = q*r*B

I find that v must equal q*r*B/m, where m is the mass(-energy?) of the pions. So, here appears to lie my mistake: I divided 382.6 MeV/c by 139.57 MeV/c2, and got 2.74, which I would assume is in units of c (which can't be right for v, since nothing exceeds v least of all a pion). So it seems like I'm missing a factor here - should I have converted the momenta in MeV/c to eV/c?

For the later components of this homework, we simply use 2D kinematics to find the momentum vectors of the pions - the sum of the components in-axis with the path of the kaon should equal the momentum of the neutral kaon, and the total momentum in the normal axis should sum to zero.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mountevans said:
F = mv2/r and p = mv = q*r*B
Those equations are non-relativistic. You can use the relationship ##E^2 = (mc^2)^2 + (pc)^2## where ##E## is the total energy of the particle and ##p## is the relativistic momentum. Also, your expression for the kinetic energy is should be ##T=(\gamma-1)mc^2 = E - mc^2##.
 
vela said:
Those equations are non-relativistic. You can use the relationship ##E^2 = (mc^2)^2 + (pc)^2## where ##E## is the total energy of the particle and ##p## is the relativistic momentum. Also, your expression for the kinetic energy is should be ##T=(\gamma-1)mc^2 = E - mc^2##.

Is ##p=γmv## correct in this instance? (where m = rest mass). Would the rest energy of the pion be 139.57 * (3*108)2 MeV, rather than the mass (in MeV/c2)? When going from mass to energy, if I'm not using c=1, I need to actually multiply by c2, right?
 
Last edited:
It was simply a problem with converting between MeV and J, if you can believe it. This page was very helpful.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top