It's not air friction that heats space shuttle?

AI Thread Summary
Air friction is not the primary cause of heating for fast-moving objects like the space shuttle; instead, it is the highly compressed air at the leading edges that generates heat. At an altitude of approximately 33,000 feet, the static pressure is around 23 kPa, with a temperature of about -56.5°C. When calculating the stagnation pressure at this altitude, assuming the shuttle travels at 20,000 km/h, the estimated stagnation pressure reaches about 5.6 MPa or 812 PSI. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the physics of air pressure and temperature in relation to high-speed atmospheric entry. Accurate calculations can provide insights into the conditions experienced by both the shuttle and meteors during atmospheric re-entry.
bluechipx
Messages
56
Reaction score
23
I read an article in a science mag. awhile back entitled "The ten misconceptions NASA tour guides hear". They said that air friction is not responsible for the heating of fast moving objects through the atmosphere, but highly compressed air at the leading edges. Now that I am enlightened, could anyone tell me the PSI that the shuttle sees on its nose area? Also the temp? This may be a tough one, but how about the PSI and temp of a meteor entering our atmosphere? Thanks Guys!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ok, let's say the stagnation pressure is the sum of the dynamic and static pressure at the nose of the shuttle when it's in the tropopause (11000km around 33000ft altitude). The static pressure at this altitude is about 23kPa, the temperature is about -56.5°C and the density of the air is around 0.36kg/m³.

So dynamic pressure is 1/2*density*v²
let's assume the shuttle is doing about 20000km/h (5555m/s) at this point, the stagnation pressure would be 1/2*0.36*5555² + 23000 = 5577444.5Pa = 5.6MPa = 56bar! (812Psi)

this is a very rough approximation, but use it as you like.
 
Pilot training is critical to safe flying. I watched the following video regarding the crash of TAM 402 (31 October 1996), which crashed into a Sao Paolo neighorbood about 25 seconds after takeoff. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TAM_Transportes_A%C3%A9reos_Regionais_Flight_402 The pilots were never trained to handle such an event (the airline had asked the manufacturer about training for this event), since it was considered too improbable (so rare) by the manufacturer. There was no...
Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/
Back
Top