I How Do Jacobi Fields Explain Tidal Forces in General Relativity?

lavinia
Science Advisor
Messages
3,363
Reaction score
750
TL;DR Summary
Particles in free fall in a gravitational field feel a tidal force that pulls them towards each other, How does once describe this force mathematically? It would seem that some feature of associated Jacobi fields should give the answer.
Given a one parameter family of geodesics, the variation vector field is a Jacobi field. Mathematically this means that the field, ##J##, satisfies the differential equation ## ∇_{V}∇_{V}J =- R(V,J,)V## where ##V## is the tangent vector field and ##R## is the curvature tensor and ##∇## is the covariant derivative operator.

Suppose the variation through geodesics is a one parameter family of particles in free fall in a gravitational field. One would think that the tidal drift could be expressed in terms of the Jacobi field ##J##. If true, how is this done mathematically and what is the physical reasoning?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lavinia said:
Particles in free fall in a gravitational field feel a tidal force that pulls them towards each other

They don't feel a force; they are in free fall, so by definition they feel zero force. However, their freely falling worldlines will diverge or converge if there is a gravitational field present due to a massive object, i.e., there will be geodesic deviation.

lavinia said:
How does once describe this force mathematically?

The Riemann curvature tensor describes all geodesic deviation.

lavinia said:
It would seem that some feature of associated Jacobi fields should give the answer.

IIRC Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler discuss this. They discuss various ways of representing the curvature tensor.
 
lavinia said:
Suppose the variation through geodesics is a one parameter family of particles in free fall in a gravitational field. One would think that the tidal drift could be expressed in terms of the Jacobi field ##J##. If true, how is this done mathematically and what is the physical reasoning?
Adding just a little more to Peter's answer,... what you know as a "Jacobi field" is known in GR as the "relative displacement vector field", or just "deviation vector field". The steps to derive the equation you mentioned (involving the Riemann tensor) are exactly what you'd expect: by assuming the tangent vector field along the geodesics and the deviation field to be independent -- meaning that the Lie bracket between them is zero -- one derives the "geodesic deviation equation", aka the"Jacobi equation".
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top