Jet Engine Intakes: Why the Squashed, Flat Design?

Click For Summary
Jet engine intakes have transitioned from circular to a squashed, flat design primarily for runway clearance. This design change accommodates larger turbofan engines while maintaining the necessary height above the ground to prevent scraping during takeoff and landing. Historical context reveals that this shape was seen as early as the first German jet engines post-World War II. Aircraft like the Boeing 737, developed in the 1960s, originally had smaller engines, but as engine size increased, the cowling was flattened to optimize air intake. The need for adequate ground clearance remains a critical consideration in modern aircraft design.
Alan G
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I half remember that jet engine intakes were circular a few years ago. Now they have a squashed appearance with the bottom part quite flat.

This isn't new as the first German jet at the end of World War II had the same shape but it seems relatively new on airline jet engines.

So, why are they this shape?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Runway clearance.

Many aircraft built during the 1970s and 1980s, such as the 737, have engines that do not appear perfectly round when seen from the front. This is because the bottom of the engine cowling (or covering) has to have clearance above the runway so that it does not scrape along the ground. When the 737 first appeared in the 1960s, it had fairly small turbojet engines that were suspended high above the ground. As the engines became larger with the introduction of turbofans, the fuselage and wing remained the same height above the ground, so the bottom of the engine cowling was flattened somewhat to still achieve the maximum air intake without scraping the ground


http://www.century-of-flight.freeol... of technology/Noise Reduction Technology.htm



As an aside, when they were testing the Rolls Royce Trent 900 engines for use on the new Airbus A380, the test plane had such little ground clearance beneath the engines that they allegedly put extra air in the tyres to get another couple of inches clearance.
 
My idea is that I want to use immerse Whitetail Antlers in a fishtank to measure their volumetric displacement (the Boone and Crockett system is the current record measurement standard to place in a juxtaposition with) I would use some sight glass plumbed into the side of the tank to get the change in height so that I can multiply by the tank cross-section. Simple Idea. But... Is there a simple mechanical way to amplify the height in the sight glass to increase measurement precision...

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
11K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K