Jet Engine Intakes: Why the Squashed, Flat Design?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Jet engine intakes have evolved from circular designs to a squashed, flat appearance primarily for runway clearance. This design change became prominent with the introduction of larger turbofan engines on aircraft like the Boeing 737, which required modifications to the engine cowling to prevent scraping the ground. The first instance of this design can be traced back to German jets at the end of World War II. Notably, during testing of the Rolls Royce Trent 900 engines for the Airbus A380, engineers inflated the tires to gain additional ground clearance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of jet engine design principles
  • Familiarity with turbofan engine technology
  • Knowledge of aircraft ground clearance requirements
  • Awareness of historical developments in aviation technology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the aerodynamic benefits of squashed jet engine intakes
  • Learn about the evolution of turbofan engines in commercial aviation
  • Investigate the impact of engine design on aircraft performance and safety
  • Explore the engineering challenges of maintaining ground clearance in aircraft design
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, aviation enthusiasts, and students studying aircraft design will benefit from this discussion on jet engine intake evolution and its implications for runway operations.

Alan G
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I half remember that jet engine intakes were circular a few years ago. Now they have a squashed appearance with the bottom part quite flat.

This isn't new as the first German jet at the end of World War II had the same shape but it seems relatively new on airline jet engines.

So, why are they this shape?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Runway clearance.

Many aircraft built during the 1970s and 1980s, such as the 737, have engines that do not appear perfectly round when seen from the front. This is because the bottom of the engine cowling (or covering) has to have clearance above the runway so that it does not scrape along the ground. When the 737 first appeared in the 1960s, it had fairly small turbojet engines that were suspended high above the ground. As the engines became larger with the introduction of turbofans, the fuselage and wing remained the same height above the ground, so the bottom of the engine cowling was flattened somewhat to still achieve the maximum air intake without scraping the ground


http://www.century-of-flight.freeol... of technology/Noise Reduction Technology.htm



As an aside, when they were testing the Rolls Royce Trent 900 engines for use on the new Airbus A380, the test plane had such little ground clearance beneath the engines that they allegedly put extra air in the tyres to get another couple of inches clearance.
 

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
11K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K