Is the Joule-Kelvin Expansion Reversible?

AI Thread Summary
The Joule-Kelvin expansion, also known as the Joule-Thompson effect, involves the free expansion of gas through a throttle valve. This process is quasistatic but is not reversible due to the necessity of a finite pressure difference across the throttle valve. The expansion relies on the presence of attractive forces between gas molecules, which is essential for the cooling effect to occur. Since throttling inherently involves irreversibility, the Joule-Kelvin expansion cannot be considered a reversible process. Thus, the conclusion is that the Joule-Kelvin expansion is not reversible.
bon
Messages
547
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Is the Joule Kelvin expansion reversible or not?



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



It\'s definitely quasistatic but I\'m not sure if it is reversible or not? I have a feeling it\'s not but can;t explain why...any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bon said:

Homework Statement



Is the Joule Kelvin expansion reversible or not?

...

It\'s definitely quasistatic but I\'m not sure if it is reversible or not? I have a feeling it\'s not but can;t explain why...any ideas?
The Joule Kelvin or Joule-Thompson cooling effect requires letting the gas expand freely using a throttle valve. (It only works with gases having attractive forces between molecules.). Throttling is not a reversible process since it requires more than an infinitessimal pressure difference between the two sides of the throttle valve.

AM
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top