Kinematics motion-police's radars(answer check)

  • Thread starter Thread starter negation
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
A police radar has a range of 1 km, while a radar detector can detect up to 1.9 km. The scenario involves a vehicle traveling at 110 km/h in a 70 km/h zone when the detector activates. To avoid a speeding ticket, the vehicle must decelerate before reaching the police radar's effective range. It's important to use correct sign conventions and SI units in calculations to ensure accuracy in determining the necessary deceleration rate.
negation
Messages
817
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A police radar's effective range is 1km and your radar detector's range is 1.9km. You're going at 110kmh^-1 in a 70kmh^-1 zone when the detector beeps. At what rate must negatively accelerate to avoid a speeding ticket?


Homework Equations


none


The Attempt at a Solution


Capture.JPG
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer looks correct. But a couple of points: firstly, you should be careful about your sign conventions. It appears that you took the police radar gun's position as being the origin (this should be stated). Distances going outward from the police position toward you are increasing in a positive direction. So you start out at +1.9km (when your detector goes off), and you're heading in a negative y direction toward the police position. Your aim is to decelerate to 70km/h before you hit a position of +1.0km, when the police radar would've acquired your speed.

This convention is fine, but in this case, remember that your velocities are actually all negative. It doesn't matter when you square them, of course, but you should still write them correctly within the parantheses. Also, note that the deceleration you calculate will be an acceleration directed along the positive direction (i.e. a "push" away from the police cruiser, opposite to your direction of your car's motion), and hence will come out positive, which explains why the "a" value you calculated is positive. Nothing wrong with this, but it's worth noting why it came out positive when the usual convention is to have a negative value signifying a deceleration.

A slightly more intuitive approach would be to let your car's position at the point of your radar detector beeping be the origin. Your ordinate increases in the direction of travel, and your aim is to decelerate from +110km/h to +70km/h before you hit +0.9km (which is where the police radar can pick up your speed). This way, you get a conventional negative answer for "a".

One more thing: about your units. It really would be better to convert everything to base SI units before doing the calculation. The numbers work out fine in what you did, but some of the units are wrong. For instance when you square the velocities and subtract, the result should be expressed in ##km^2h^{-2}## and not ##kmh^{-1}## as you did. Also, the denominator should have a unit, i.e. ##(3600sh^{-1})^2 = (3600)^2s^2h^{-2}##. It's also clear that you didn't include a factor of 1000 in that expression, even though you did actually multiply by it before getting the final answer. The expression should really be:

##\displaystyle \frac{\frac{4900 km^2h^{-2} - 12100km^2h^{-2}}{(2)(-0.9km)}}{10^{-3}(km)m^{-1}(3600sh^{-1})^2}##, which would give you the correct answer. But this is very unwieldy, and you're better off just converting to base SI units from the get-go.
 
Last edited:
looks good (Your answer was actually .0003 km/s^2, which you apparently converted behind the scenes to 0.3m/s^2)
Edit: ..and with signage/unit errors as noted by Curious.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top