Algebraic Approach to Calculating Time for an Object to Fall from a Given Height

  • Thread starter Thread starter oldspice1212
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the time it takes for a book to fall from a height of 1.75 meters using the equation d = Vi(t) - 1/2at^2. The initial velocity is zero, which simplifies the equation significantly, allowing for easier calculations. Participants clarify the importance of defining positive and negative directions in the equation, which affects the signs of the terms. It is suggested that using the quadratic formula is appropriate when the initial velocity is not zero. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the algebraic approach to solving motion problems and the utility of substituting values to simplify calculations.
oldspice1212
Messages
149
Reaction score
2
Hey guys so I have a quick question about the algebra for a question like this.
I personally like to do the algebra first before I plug in the numbers so I have question for this one where it seems would be safer to plug in the numbers first?

So won't be to tough,

A book falls from a shelf that is 1.75m above the floor. How long will it take the book to reach the floor?

So we have initial velocity = 0
Displacement = 1.75m
Acceleration/ gravity = 9.81m/s
Time=?

Its obvious that we can use the formula d=Vi(t)-1/2at^2

So my question here is for the algebra if we plug the numbers in first it would be easier since we have initial velocity =0 so we can do (0)t=0. But if we didn't this is where I have trouble since I'm not the best at algebra, we'd get

Square root( (2d/g)) - Vi(t) = t which confuses me because of the initial velocity * Time? What would we have to do with the time there.

Thanks, I hope I didn't confuse anyone lol.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should end up with a quadratic equation which you solve accordingly.

Given your equation, d=Vi(t)-1/2at^2, you seem to be mixing up your coordinate directions. If the book is falling and you're taking the eventual displacement as positive (d = 1.75m), then your assumption is that "down" is positive. But then you write -1/2at2 which appears to assume that "up" is positive (given a positive value for acceleration).

So. Let's say that "up" is positive, and the floor is the zero reference. Then the initial displacement is d and the final displacement is 0. Then you can write:

##0 = d + v_it - \frac{1}{2}at^2## {where a is a positive constant, the magnitude of the acceleration}

There's your quadratic equation.

Alternatively, you could take the zero reference to be at the book's initial position on the shelf, and "down" to be positive. Then you might write:

##-d = 0 + v_it + \frac{1}{2}at^2##

In either case, if ##v_i## is zero then the quadratic becomes easy to solve...
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
If Vi ≠ 0, then you are dealing with a general quadratic equation in t. Use the quadratic formula to solve it. See here.

For a video review, try here.

[EDIT: I see gneill already provided an answer.]
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
oldspice1212 said:
Hey guys so I have a quick question about the algebra for a question like this.
I personally like to do the algebra first before I plug in the numbers so I have question for this one where it seems would be safer to plug in the numbers first?

So won't be to tough,

A book falls from a shelf that is 1.75m above the floor. How long will it take the book to reach the floor?

So we have initial velocity = 0
Displacement = 1.75m
Acceleration/ gravity = 9.81m/s
Time=?

Its obvious that we can use the formula d=Vi(t)-1/2at^2

So my question here is for the algebra if we plug the numbers in first it would be easier since we have initial velocity =0 so we can do (0)t=0. But if we didn't this is where I have trouble since I'm not the best at algebra, we'd get

Square root( (2d/g)) - Vi(t) = t which confuses me because of the initial velocity * Time? What would we have to do with the time there.

Thanks, I hope I didn't confuse anyone lol.
So, if the initial velocity is zero, you can just substitute Vi = 0 into your final equation and get the correct result. But seriously, for arbitrary initial velocity, if you want to solve it algebraically, it is best to follow the advice of the previous posters.
 
Ah quadratic formula, been ages since I've used that, thanks a lot guys, it helped :)!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top