Kinetic and potential energies of a harmonic oscillator

AI Thread Summary
In a harmonic oscillator, the average potential and kinetic energies in the quantum case are both E/2, which aligns with classical values. The discussion emphasizes that the quantum oscillator's energies depend on average values, similar to classical mechanics where energy is conserved. Participants confirm that calculating the average values for kinetic and potential energies in both cases shows they are equivalent. The problem essentially asks for a comparison of these expectation values, which have been found to be the same. This highlights the consistency between quantum and classical harmonic oscillators in terms of energy distribution.
Von Neumann
Messages
101
Reaction score
4
Problem:

In a harmonic oscillator

\left\langle V \right\rangle=\left\langle K \right\rangle=\frac{E_{0}}{2}

How does this result compare with the classical values of K and V?

Solution:

For a classical harmonic oscillator

V=1/2kx^2
K=1/2mv^2

I don't really know where to begin. Is it safe to say that quantum oscillator must depend on the average values of the kinetic and potential energies? Also, the values of the energies in the classical system are conserved in such a way to conserve total mechanical energy.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the problem statement telling you that the expectation values for the kinetic and potential energies are each E/2 in the quantum case?

If so then perhaps it wants you to calculate the average values in the classical case and show that they're the same.
 
Pagan Harpoon said:
Is the problem statement telling you that the expectation values for the kinetic and potential energies are each E/2 in the quantum case?

If so then perhaps it wants you to calculate the average values in the classical case and show that they're the same.

Oh yes, I've already done that. I calculated <U> and <K> separately.
 
Then haven't you already solved the problem? If you have the expectation values for the kinetic and potential energies in both the classical and quantum cases, then you can compare them and see that they are the same.

Is the question asking you for something more?
 
The question is simply asking to compare the expectation values <V> and <K> of the quantum harmonic oscillator (given above) with the classical values of V and K.
 
Last edited:
If I were faced with that question, I would calculate the average values for V and K in the classical case (which you have done) and then comment that they are the same as the expectation values in the quantum case - that's how they compare, they're the same.

What more do you want to do?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top