Kinetic Energy and bowling ball Question

AI Thread Summary
A 7kg bowling ball falling from a 2m shelf has its kinetic energy calculated using the conservation of energy principle. Initially, potential energy (PE) is converted to kinetic energy (KE) just before impact, with the relevant equations being PE = mgy and KE = 1/2mv^2. The correct final velocity before hitting the ground is determined to be approximately 6.26 m/s, leading to a kinetic energy of about 137.2 J. The initial miscalculation stemmed from incorrectly solving for velocity without taking the square root. Understanding the relationship between potential and kinetic energy is crucial for solving such problems accurately.
JCB
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 7kg bowling ball falls from a 2m shelf. Just before hitting the floor, what will its kinetic energy be? (air resistance is negligible)

Homework Equations


PEi + KEi = PEf + KEf
KE = 1/2mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution


m = 7kg
Δy = 2m
g = 9.8m/s^2
Vi = 0 m/s
I solved for the final velocity, using PEi + KEi = PEf + KEf, and found it to be 39.2 m/s. Then, I plugged that into the equation KE = 1/2mv^2, and got the Kinetic Energy, but my answer was way off. (The correct answer is 137J)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JCB said:

Homework Statement


A 7kg bowling ball falls from a 2m shelf. Just before hitting the floor, what will its kinetic energy be? (air resistance is negligible)


Homework Equations


PEi + KEi = PEf + KEf
KE = 1/2mv^2


The Attempt at a Solution


m = 7kg
Δy = 2m
g = 9.8m/s^2
Vi = 0 m/s
I solved for the final velocity, using PEi + KEi = PEf + KEf, and found it to be 39.2 m/s. Then, I plugged that into the equation KE = 1/2mv^2, and got the Kinetic Energy, but my answer was way off. (The correct answer is 137J)
You have the correct relevant equations. But you left out the formula for PE. Define what PE is and try again, please.
 
PhanthomJay said:
You have the correct relevant equations. But you left out the formula for PE. Define what PE is and try again, please.

PE = mgy

but I don't need any help on this. I realized what I did wrong: nothing!

I got v^2 to be 39.2, and forgot to solve for just v.

That would explain a lot.
 
JCB said:
PE = mgy

but I don't need any help on this. I realized what I did wrong: nothing!

I got v^2 to be 39.2, and forgot to solve for just v.

That would explain a lot.
BUT why are you solving for V? you're working in reverse. You have to find the KE first, then you solved for V, then you plugged it back and solved for KE again?
 
PhanthomJay said:
BUT why are you solving for V? you're working in reverse. You have to find the KE first, then you solved for V, then you plugged it back and solved for KE again?

Your looking for the KE just before the ball hits the floor. In order to do that, you need to first find it's velocity just before it hits the floor. So you do PEi + KEi = PEf + KEf. KEi goes to 0 since it's starting from rest, and PEf goes to 0 since y=0 just before it hits the floor. So you're left with PEi = KEf, which can also be written as mgy = 1/2mv^2. Plug everything in: (7)(9.8)(2)=1/2(7)v^2

you get v^2=39.2

and me being the lazy guy I am forgot to write v^2 and just wrote v, which meant my final velocity was way off. Once I realized I forgot to square root each side, I was able to get the real final velocity (6.26 m/s) and then plug that into KEf = 1/2mv^2, which means KEf = 1/2(7)(39.2), which means that KEf = 137.2 J.

So, in short, I couldn't solve for KEf to begin with because I didn't have the final velocity to begin with. If I already had the final velocity, that would have been a joke question.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top