Kinetic energy efficiency question

AI Thread Summary
A roller coaster descends 55 meters, converting gravitational potential energy to kinetic energy with an efficiency of 50%. To find the velocity at the bottom, the potential energy lost must equal half of the initial potential energy due to the efficiency loss. The kinetic energy formula, mv²/2, is used to relate the energies, leading to the equation v = (gh)^(1/2). By applying conservation of energy principles, the effective kinetic energy is calculated as half of the potential energy change. This method provides a clear path to determine the roller coaster's velocity at the low point.
13physicsdude
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A roller coaster descends 55m from the top of the first high point to the first low point in the track. The roller coaster converts gravitational potential energy to kinetic energy with an efficiency of 50.0%. What is the velocity of the roller coaster at the bottom of the first low point?

Homework Equations



Efficiency= (Eout/Ein)100%

The Attempt at a Solution



I have no clue how to do it! I don't understand how to use the efficiency equation to get velocity, please help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
13physicsdude said:

The Attempt at a Solution


You forgot to fill out this part, you'll need to before we can help you :wink:
 
Ein is gravitational potential energy, Eout is kinetic energy. Take into account the formula for kinetic energy, mv^2/2.
 
then .5mgh=.5mv^2 then v=(gh)^(.5) solve to get
 
Using conservation of energy, the energy of roller coaster+earth system is conserved, in an ideal case, i.e. change in potential energy = change in kinetic energy. However, in this case there is 50% loss of energy, i.e. only half of the potential energy change equals the kinetic energy change. I think you have your answer now! :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top