Kinetic Energy of an arrow problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mass of an arrow that slows down while passing through an apple. The initial and final velocities of both the arrow and the apple are provided, along with the apple's mass. The initial attempt used kinetic energy equations, but the poster struggled to arrive at the correct mass. Another participant suggests using conservation of momentum instead of kinetic energy, highlighting that all necessary values are available for this approach. The conversation emphasizes the importance of selecting the right physics principle for solving the problem effectively.
HeavyGuy
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An arrow slows down from 43 m/s to 28 m/s as it passes through an apple. If the 493-g apple was originally at rest and sped up to 0.44 m/s, what is the mass of the arrow

Vapple,i = 0 m/s
Vapple,f = 0.44 m/s
Varrow,i = 43 m/s
Varrow,f = 28 m/s
m,apple = o.493 kg
m,arrow = ?


Homework Equations



im guessing we only need Eki = Ekf which is 1/2mvi(ar)^2 + 1/2mvi(ap)^2 + 1/2mvf(ar)^2 + 1/2mvf(ap)^2

The Attempt at a Solution



i plugged it all into the equation so it looks like this near the end

924.5m = 0.0477224 + 392m

i then subtracted the 392 from 924.5 and divided that number by the long decimal to solve for m, but answer was totally off. can anyone tell me where i went wrong? thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think i would approach this questions as a conservation of momentum problem rather than
 
I think i would approach this problem as a conservation of momentum rather than kinetic energy.
Pi = Pf
marvi ar + m apvi ap = marvf ar + m apvf ap

so you know the mass of the apple, both initial and final velocities of the arrow as well as both initial and final velocities of the apple!

Hope that helps!
 
thanks a lot! i was wondering what i was doing wrong lol
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top