Kinetic Energy Problem - from GRE

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a GRE practice problem involving the kinetic energy of a system of three equal masses connected by massless rods in an equilateral triangle. The problem requires calculating the ratio of kinetic energy when rotating about two different axes, A (center of the triangle) and B (corner of the triangle). The correct answer is determined to be 2, contrasting with an initial incorrect calculation of 3. The confusion arose from misinterpreting the mass distribution of the rods as having mass rather than being massless. Ultimately, the solution hinges on understanding the moments of inertia for the different axes of rotation.
yxgao
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
This is #32 on the GRE practice exam from www.gre.org.
Three equal masses m are rigidly connected to each other by massless rods of length l forming an equilateral triangle, as shown above. The assembly is to be given an angular velocity w about an axis perpendicular to the triangle. For fixed w, the ratio of the kinetic energy of the assembly for an axis through B compared with that for an axis through A is equal to
[A is located at the center of the triangle, B is located at a corner of the triangle]
a. 3
b. 2
c. 1
d. 1/2
e. 1/3
The answer is B, but I get 3 for an answer.
This is an easy problem, but for some reason I don't know why I am not getting it. Can someone else work this out and tell me if you get the right answer, and how you arrive at it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Solution.

Moments of Inertia of Point masses are MR^2 when you're rotating through the center of the triangle the Radius is L/(3^.5) and there are three masses when you're rotating about the corner the radius is L and there are two masses. So it works out something lize this...

B=2*M*(L)^2 : A=3*M*[L/(3^.5)]^2

which reduces to B=2ML^2 and A=ML^2
this works because Omega is fixed and the only portion of the kinetic energy changing is the Rotational which is equivalent to a change in the net moment of inertia. I think that is right...

A bored CSMPhysicist.
 
Thanks,
I misread the question. I was treating the sticks as the particles instead of them being massless. I did the problem again, and got 2.
--Ying
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top