Kinetic Energy Question: How to Calculate KE on a Moving Train | Homework Help

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the kinetic energy of a suitcase on a moving train, with specific focus on the differences in perception of kinetic energy before and after knowing the train's velocity. The subject area is primarily physics, specifically relating to concepts of kinetic energy and reference frames.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss how to interpret kinetic energy in different reference frames, questioning how to determine kinetic energy without a given velocity. Some suggest that the suitcase has no kinetic energy relative to the train, while others explore how it would be calculated from an external frame of reference.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring different interpretations of kinetic energy based on reference frames. Some have attempted calculations for part B, while others are clarifying the implications of the problem's wording and the assumptions involved.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the implications of relative motion and the necessity of specifying a frame of reference when discussing kinetic energy. Participants note the importance of unit conversions for accurate calculations.

engineer21394
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



assume you are taking a trip on a train. you carry a filled suitcase that weighs 170N, and during the course of your trip you are told that the train is moving at 140 km/hr.
(a) what do you observe the kinetic energy of the suitcase to be, before you are told the velocity?
(b) what do you interpret the kinetic energy of the suitcase to be after knowing the velocity?

Homework Equations



part B would be utilizing the equation ke= 1/2mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution



kE= 1/2(170/9.18)(140)^2
KE= 169834

Im not sure about how to go about part a of the question, how would you determine the kinetic energy if no velocity is given? any information would be highly appreciated thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I get the feeling part a is some kind of trick question. The phrase that popped out to me was "what do you observe the kinetic energy to be"? It makes me think that, since you and the suitcase are in the same reference frame, and if you assume that you're at a steady velocity (i.e. the train is not accelerating) that the suitcase has no kinetic energy; it is as if the train is not moving at all.

In part b, they ask a similar question since you now know the train is definitely moving. Now, with what you know, what is the kinetic energy of the suitcase in relation to the Earth's reference frame? It definitely won't be zero in that case.

Hope that helps.
 
engineer21394 said:

Homework Statement



assume you are taking a trip on a train. you carry a filled suitcase that weighs 170N, and during the course of your trip you are told that the train is moving at 140 km/hr.
(a) what do you observe the kinetic energy of the suitcase to be, before you are told the velocity?
(b) what do you interpret the kinetic energy of the suitcase to be after knowing the velocity?

Homework Equations



part B would be utilizing the equation ke= 1/2mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution



kE= 1/2(170/9.18)(140)^2
KE= 169834

Im not sure about how to go about part a of the question, how would you determine the kinetic energy if no velocity is given? any information would be highly appreciated thank you.

Velocity, and therefore kinetic energy is always measured relative to a defined inertial frame of reference. People in different frames of reference see things differently. This was known well before Einstein's theory - the classical version is called Galilean relativity (after Galileo).

The train is an inertial frame (since it is not accelerating relative to the ground). You are an observer within the train. The suitcase is at rest with respect to you. What is its kinetic energy?

Part b) is just a trick question. The suitcase is still at rest relative to you and the train. If the question were posed from the perspective of someone outside the train stationary on the ground, it would be different, but they didn't do that, did they?
 
Im understanding those factors but the example is looking for the kinetic energy and I don't know how it would be possible to find the kinetic energy with only giving you the mass of the suitcase. so would the kinetic energy therefore be 0 before you are told the velocity of the train?
 
engineer21394 said:
Im understanding those factors but the example is looking for the kinetic energy and I don't know how it would be possible to find the kinetic energy with only giving you the mass of the suitcase. so would the kinetic energy therefore be 0 before you are told the velocity of the train?

Yes.

0 after too. Relative to the train frame of reference. You must always state your frame of reference.

Relative to a person standing still on the ground outside, you can calculate it as you did. But you made a mistake with your units. You should convert 140 km/h to m/s.
 
so would the ke for B = ke=1/2(17.33)(38.89)^2?

getting the mass by converting 170 n to kg

and getting the velocity by converting 140 km/hr to m/s
therefore, giving us the solution = 13105kj? thank you
 
engineer21394 said:
so would the ke for B = ke=1/2(17.33)(38.89)^2?

getting the mass by converting 170 n to kg

and getting the velocity by converting 140 km/hr to m/s
therefore, giving us the solution = 13105kj? thank you

The answer (depending on how many significant figures they require) is 13100J = 13.1kJ. Again, be careful with your units. Remember to state clearly that this is the KE measured by a an observer stationary relative to the ground. You would still observe a KE of 0.
 
My attempt :
For (B) , K.E. possessed by the suitcase = (1/2)(170/9.8)(140/3.6)^2 = 13120 J, g = 9.8 m/s^2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K