Kinetic Energy/Velocity problem (not sure what I'm doing wrong)

  • Thread starter Thread starter KatieLynn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinetic
AI Thread Summary
To determine the velocity of a 40.3g golf ball that matches the kinetic energy of a 10.89kg bowling ball moving at 3.46 m/s, the kinetic energy equation is used. The initial calculation yielded an incorrect velocity of 238.3 m/s, while the correct answer is 56.88 m/s, as confirmed by another participant. The error was attributed to a miscalculation in algebra, specifically in handling the mass and squaring the velocity. A suggested method involves rearranging the kinetic energy formula before substituting values to simplify the process. The discussion emphasizes the importance of careful algebraic manipulation in solving physics problems.
KatieLynn
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 10.89kg bowling ball moves at 3.46 m/s. How fast must a 40.3g golf ball move so that the two balls have the same kinetic energy?

Homework Equations



Kinetic Energy = (1/2)V^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I set plugged the information into the kinetic energy problem and set them equal to each other to solve for V.

(1/2)(10.89kg)(3.46m/s)^2=(1/2)(.0403kg)(V^2)
V=238.3 m/s

Thats not the answer in the back of the book though, I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KatieLynn said:

Homework Statement



A 10.89kg bowling ball moves at 3.46 m/s. How fast must a 40.3g golf ball move so that the two balls have the same kinetic energy?

Homework Equations



Kinetic Energy = (1/2)V^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I set plugged the information into the kinetic energy problem and set them equal to each other to solve for V.

(1/2)(10.89kg)(3.46m/s)^2=(1/2)(.0403kg)(V^2)
V=238.3 m/s

Thats not the answer in the back of the book though, I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong.

You may want to recheck that calculation, I did it and got 56.88 m/s, but then again I may also have to check mine :)
 
Ahh I get that now, and that's the answer in the back of the book, I'm not sure how I was doing the algebra wrong, thanks:)!
 
Hello,

Your formula is off (you're missing the m), but it looks like you used the correct form in the calculation.

Your calculation is off, you need to recheck. Are you sure your only squaring the velocity?

Incidentally, another way to do this is to solve for the velocity of the golf ball before you substitute numbers in:

\frac{1}{2}m_{b}{v_{b}}^2 = \frac{1}{2}m_{g}{v_{g}}^2 \Rightarrow m_{b}{v_{b}}^2 = m_{g}{v_{g}}^2 \Rightarrow \frac{m_{b}{v_{b}}^2}{m_{g}} = {v_{g}}^2 \Rightarrow v_{g} = \sqrt{\frac{m_{b}}{m_{g}}} \cdot v_{b}

Hope this helps.

Edit: You solved it before I could get the LaTeX down :-) Good job
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top