Kinetic Energy when the Force is Perpendicular to Velocity

AI Thread Summary
When a force of constant magnitude acts perpendicular to the velocity of a particle, the work done is zero, resulting in no change in kinetic energy. This is supported by the work-energy theorem, which confirms that kinetic energy remains constant under these conditions. Additionally, since the force has no component in the direction of the velocity, it cannot alter the particle's speed. Therefore, the kinetic energy of the particle remains unchanged throughout its motion. The discussion emphasizes that the perpendicular nature of the force is key to maintaining constant kinetic energy.
Vavi Ask
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given, force of constant magnitude, which is always perpendicular to the velocity of the particle & the motion takes place in a plane. What happens to its kinetic energy? Explain.

Homework Equations


Work energy theorem

The Attempt at a Solution


According to work energy theorem, the work done turns out to be zero. This implies that the change in kinetic energy is zero i.e. the kinetic energy is constant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, this is completely correct. The change in kinetic energy is zero.
 
Clever Penguin said:
Yes, this is completely correct. The change in kinetic energy is zero.
But there is a problem. Can we answer this question in other words where this work energy theorem is not used?
 
Vavi Ask said:
But there is a problem. Can we answer this question in other words where this work energy theorem is not used?
Since force is perpendicular to the velocity, it has no component along the direction of the velocity vector. This means the force can't change the magnitude of the velocity. Hence, it remains constant.
 
cnh1995 said:
Since force is perpendicular to the velocity, it has no component along the direction of the velocity vector. This means the force can't change the magnitude of the velocity. Hence, it remains constant.
Thanks a lot sir.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top