Kinetic Friction & Accelerating Crate: Unraveling the Mystery

AI Thread Summary
A crate on an accelerating truck appears to accelerate backwards due to kinetic friction, which is the only horizontal force acting on it. According to Newton's second law, the acceleration of the crate is determined by the frictional force opposing its motion. Without friction, the crate would maintain its speed relative to the ground, moving forward as the truck accelerates. However, with friction present, the crate moves backwards relative to the truck, and the frictional force acts to decelerate this motion. Ultimately, the crate will still fall off the truck, but the presence of friction delays this outcome.
healthfreak
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1. Why does a crate on an accelerating truck accelerate backwards proportional to the amount of kinetic friction? I don't understand why the crate accelerates backwards as if kinetic friction was the only force acting on it.



2. Homework Equations :
F=ma
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi healthfreak! Welcome to PF! :smile:
healthfreak said:
1. Why does a crate on an accelerating truck accelerate backwards proportional to the amount of kinetic friction? I don't understand why the crate accelerates backwards as if kinetic friction was the only force acting on it.

Relevant equations:
F=ma

Yup … good ol' Newton's second law … F = ma. :smile:

But that's a vector equation …

so it's valid in each direction individually

(in other words, you can take components in any fixed direction, and F = ma still works).

Now on a flatbed truck (I assume the floor of your truck is flat :wink:), the only movement possible is horizontal, so the acceleration must be purely horizontal, so if you take horizontal components, then the kinetic friction is the only force acting on it! :smile:
 
healthfreak said:
1. Why does a crate on an accelerating truck accelerate backwards proportional to the amount of kinetic friction? I don't understand why the crate accelerates backwards as if kinetic friction was the only force acting on it.

The friction it is the only force acting on it (along the horizontal direction).
What other force do you see here?
If there is no friction, when the truck accelerates the crate will simply keep moving with constant speed (the speed of the truck right before accelerating). Relative to the ground the crate will move forward. Relative to the truck it will move backwards (and eventually fall off).
Now if you have some friction, when the crate moves backwards (relative to the truck) the friction (acting forward, right?) will slow down the motion. The acceleration is negative and is a=Ffriction/m). It will still fall off but later.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top