Kirchoff's rules and capacitors

  • Thread starter Thread starter BOAS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitors Rules
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around applying Kirchhoff's rules to a circuit with resistors, a capacitor, and a battery. The main question is about determining the charge on the capacitor when it is fully charged. It is clarified that when the capacitor is fully charged, it behaves like an open circuit, and the voltage across it can be measured with an ideal voltmeter. Participants suggest using the potential divider rule to find the voltage at the junction of the resistors, which will help in calculating the charge on the capacitor. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
BOAS
Messages
546
Reaction score
19
Hello,

I thought I had questions concerning Kirchoff's rules down to a tee, but now capacitors have entered the scene and I'm stumped.

Homework Statement



The circuit in the drawing (attached) shows two resistors, a capacitor, and a battery. When the capacitor is fully charged, what is the magnitude q of the charge on one of its plates?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I apologise for the terrible resolution of the image, but I think it's still readable.

From the junction rule;

IA = IB + IC

For loop A;

12V = 2IA + 4IC

My textbook says a loop does not need to contain a battery, so my expression for loop B is;

4Ic = Q/C

I am confused about whether the capacitor represents a voltage drop, because to me, it seems like a fully charged capacitor should create a potential rise.

I am unsure about whether I need to make an expression for the loop created by the 'outer' sides of the circuit.

Please can you help me in this regard?

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • kirchoff2.PNG
    kirchoff2.PNG
    8.4 KB · Views: 562
Physics news on Phys.org
When the capacitor is fully charged, no more current will go through it, so you can ignore the loop B.

Even if the capacitor isn't fully charged, you can treat the resistor and the capacitor as one circuit element, with I = V/R + C (dV/dt), and you can still ignore loop B.
 
When the capacitor is fully charged, you can imagine removing it from the circuit and replacing it with a voltmeter, an ideal voltmeter. Whatever reading the voltmeter gives is the same voltage as on the fully charged capacitor that is/was there. :smile:

* remember, an ideal voltmeter has infinite resistance and it draws no current
 
Are you familiar with potential divider circuits? Work out the voltage at the junction of R1 and R2 without the capacitor present. What happens if the voltage on the capacitor reaches this voltage?

Once you figure that out you can work out the charge on the capacitor.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top