Kitchen Chemistry. Cooking pasta

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrspeedybob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry Cooking
AI Thread Summary
Cooking pasta with the lid on may reduce energy use but can negatively affect the final product. The pressure increase from a covered pot slightly raises the boiling point, but this change is minimal. Many culinary sources recommend cooking pasta uncovered to prevent boiling over and ensure proper texture. Uncovered cooking promotes vigorous motion and convection, which are essential for even cooking. Ultimately, keeping the pot open is preferred for achieving the best pasta quality.
mrspeedybob
Messages
869
Reaction score
65
My wife insists that pasta is not to be cooked with the lid on the pot. I reason that the cooking temperature must be fairly constant at the boiling point of water, so the energy required to cook the pasta can be reduced by putting a lid on the pot and turning the burner down just enough that the water does not boil over. It is true that many online sources specify that pasta is to be cooked uncovered so I tried to come up with possible explanations.

I do understand that the lid will slightly raise the pressure at the surface of the water, thus causing a slight increase in the boiling point, but I can't imagine it being a significant increase.

A recipe that specifies pasta to be cooked uncovered may include a certain amount of extra water, which is intended to boil away. Making this recipe with that amount of water, but in a covered pot, may result in too much water remaining in the pot. I find this hypothesis unlikely due to the fact that pasta is usually drained of excess water after cooking.

Uncovered pasta is less likely to boil over and make a mess on the stove. I believe this is the most likely reason that most culinary web sites specify pasta to be cooked in an open pot.

Am I correct? Does anybody else have any insight on why most culinary websites specify pasta to be cooked uncovered? Can it, in fact, have a perceptable influence on the final product?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you cook pasta covered it'll go slimy/starchy.

So it's your choice, you can save 0.001% of the energy to cook the pasta that tastes terrible. OR, listen to your wife and do it properly.
 
What is physically different about the water that the pasta is cooking in that depends on the presence or absence of the lid?
 
Not got a clue, a covered pot makes crap pasta. An open pot makes crap rice.

It's magic.
 
mrspeedybob said:
What is physically different about the water that the pasta is cooking in that depends on the presence or absence of the lid?

Pasta cooks best when it's in constant vigorous motion. Lots of heat at the bottom of the pot and rapid heat loss at the top means lots of convection through the water to keep things moving. Indeed, if you're ever stuck trying to cook pasta over too small a burner, you can sometimes salvage the situation by vigorously stirring the pasta as it cooks.
 
That sounds plausable. Thanks.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top