Ladder against a frictionless wall

  • Thread starter Thread starter rcouto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frictionless Wall
AI Thread Summary
A uniform ladder leaning against a frictionless vertical wall at a 45° angle requires a coefficient of friction (µ) of at least 0.5 at the ground to prevent it from falling. The discussion highlights the complexity of normal forces acting on the ladder, with friction only applicable at the ground. When considering a sloping wall, the relationship between the angles changes, affecting the forces involved. The scenario maintains an isosceles triangle configuration, but the angles are no longer 45 degrees. The physical arrangement of the ladder against different wall types illustrates the varying distances from the wall's base, emphasizing the importance of angle in determining stability.
rcouto
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
A uniform ladder leans safely against a vertical wall at an angle 45° to the horizontal
ground. The wall is 100% slippery, while at the ground the coefficient of friction is µ .
Prove that since the ladder is not falling, µ \geq 0.5

I've attempted to solve this, and think I have, granted that Friction=\mumg, but is this true? If so, is it always true? I was taught that Friction=\mu*Normal Force, and normal force=mg, but there are 2 normal forces in this problem, that of the wall on the ladder and that of the ground on the ladder.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But what if the wall is not vertical, but sloping away from the ladder at an angle to the ground of 2theta? Arrange the ladder so it makes the same angle with the wall as it makes to the ground


Wouldn't 2theta just equal 90 degrees then? Because 2theta+theta+theta=180 degrees
in which case the wall isn't actually sloping away from the ladder at all...
 
rcouto said:
I've attempted to solve this, and think I have, granted that Friction=\mumg, but is this true?
Yes, for this problem, since you want the smallest value of µ.
If so, is it always true? I was taught that Friction=\mu*Normal Force, and normal force=mg, but there are 2 normal forces in this problem, that of the wall on the ladder and that of the ground on the ladder.
So? Only the ground surface has friction.
 
rcouto said:
But what if the wall is not vertical, but sloping away from the ladder at an angle to the ground of 2theta? Arrange the ladder so it makes the same angle with the wall as it makes to the ground

If the wall was not vertical, then there would be a vertical component to the Normal Reaction Force from the wall to take into account.
 
PeterO said:
If the wall was not vertical, then there would be a vertical component to the Normal Reaction Force from the wall to take into account.

Yes, but I don't understand how it could be sloping away from the ladder using the given values for the angles. If the wall makes an angle of 2theta with the ground, and the angles the ladder makes with the wall and the ground are equal, wouldn't 2theta=90 degrees?
 
rcouto said:
Yes, but I don't understand how it could be sloping away from the ladder using the given values for the angles. If the wall makes an angle of 2theta with the ground, and the angles the ladder makes with the wall and the ground are equal, wouldn't 2theta=90 degrees?

In the first problem, the wall was vertical, the angle between wall and ground = 90
The ladder was placed so that the ladder made two 45 degree angles, one with the wall, one with the ground. The Ground, wall and ladder form an isosceles triangle

The sloping wall situation appears to be changing the situation between wall, ground and ladder, but retaining the isosceles triangle condition. Ther will not be 45 degree angles anymore.

To physically arrange this: suppose you have have a smooth vertical wall at one end of a basketball court, and a smooth angled wall at the other end.
First you place the ladder against the vertical wall, creating an isosceles triangle.
Next you pick up the ladder, carry it to the other end of the court and place the ladder against that wall - again creating an isosceles triangle.
The foot of the ladder will be different distances from the base of the wall in each case!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top