Lagrange Multipliers: A Long First Post

stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4
A long first post, but not too hard!

dont worry about this i already solved it thanks anyway!

The lagrangian of a particle of mass m moving under constant gravity is
\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2} m (\dot{x}^2 + \dot{z}^2 - mgz = \frac{1}{2}m (\dot{\rho}^2 + \rho^2 \dot{\phi}^2) - mg \rho \cos \phi
If the particle is contrained to move on the surface rho= R where R>0 is a constant (such as a parrticle slifing off a sphere or a cylinder) thjen the constraint is rho =R can be taken into account, in teh Lagrangian Formalism by the Lagrange multiplier method i.e. by starting wiuth the lagrangian
\mathcal{L}' = \mathcal{L} + \lambda (\rho - R)

a) Work out the two equations of motion \frac{d}{dt} \left(\frac{\partial L'}{\partial \dot{q_{i}}} \right) = \frac{\partial L'}{\partial q_{i}}, q_{i}= (\rho,phi)

Do i have to solve these? I mean i will be forming coupled non linear second order DEs...

\frac{\partial L'}{\partial \phi} = mg \rho \sin \phi
\frac{\partial L'}{\partial \dot{\phi}} = m \rho^2 \dot{\phi}
\frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial L'}{\partial \dot{\phi}} = 2 m \rho \dot{\rho} \dot{\phi} + m \rho^2 \ddot{\phi}
into the Euler Lagrange
2 m \rho \dot{\rho} \dot{\phi} + m \rho^2 \ddot{\phi} = mg \rho \sin \phi

\frac{\partial L'}{\partial \rho} = m \rho \dot{\phi}^2 - mg \cos \phi - \lambda
\frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{p}} = \frac{d}{dt} m \dot{\rho} = m \ddot{\rho}
Euler Lagrange
m \ddot{\rho} = m \rho \dot{\phi}^2 - mg \cos \phi - \lambda

i don't think it is possibel to solve them...

b) Incorporate the constraint rho = R into the equations obtained in a). Detremine the dimensions of the Lagrange multiplier lambda and explain teh physical meaning of lambda. (use a diagram)

R \dot{\phi}^2 + g \cos \phi + \frac{\lambda}{m} = 0
\ddot{\phi} - mR \sin \dot{\phi} - mg \sin \phi = 0
rearrange the first one for lambda yields
\lambda = -m(R \dot{\phi}^2 + g \cos \phi)
so lambda's units are
\lambda = kg(m \frac{rad^2}{s^2} + \frac{m}{s^2})
so lambda is N rad^2 + N ...? How si this siginificant >??

c)Determine whether thi system is conservative. If so derive the expression for the cosnant energy. If the system is not conservativem explain why not.
System is conservative if the force can be written as the derivative of some function dpeendant on one variable only (??)
well isn't hte force simply mg?
to find the constant energy expression do i find the Hamiltonian of the system? Two variables so there will be two of them?

d)Use your results of b and c to obtai the expression for lambda at angle phi given that the particel starts at phi =0 (t hte top of the sphere or cylinder) and is given an intiial speed of v0 = R omega0

e) At hwat angle would hte particle leave teh surface (of the sphere or cylinder)? What would this angle be if v0 = 0? What is tha largest vbalue that v0 could be for the particle to slide along the sphere (or cylinder) at least briefly? Evaluate this limiting value of v0 if R=1 meter.

last two i will psot solutions for later on
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
\lambda's units are of force...So...

Daniel.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top