Lagrangian Dynamics Homework: Find Missing Term

davon806
Messages
147
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


New Bitmap Image (2).jpg


Homework Equations


The last part of this question is an example of this result:
C.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution


Here is the solution
a.jpg


I think L' is missing a term: If we take the Earth as your frame of reference.(i.e. You are stationary, watching the movement of the railway carriage).Then there should be an extra term for the KE of pendulum,due to horizontal movement of the carriage. (see below, the y dot term corresponds to v of the carriage)
b.jpg


Why is it not involved in L' ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your constraint equation is ##\dot y = v(t)##. This implies that the term you are referring to only depends on t and therefore is a total derivative (and hence irrelevant for the equations of motion).
 
Orodruin said:
Your constraint equation is ##\dot y = v(t)##. This implies that the term you are referring to only depends on t and therefore is a total derivative (and hence irrelevant for the equations of motion).
Sorry, could you explain it in more detail? I couldn't get it
 
Which part do you have trouble with? There is only one degree of freedom for the pendulum, the angle ##\theta##. The final Lagrangian cannot depend on ##y## since the motion of ##y## is given by integrating ##v(t)##. The constraint gives you ##\dot y = v(t)## and so ##y(t)## is a primitive function of ##v(t)##. Inserting the constraint into your Lagrangian means your ##\dot y^2## term turns into
$$
\frac{\mu v(t)^2}{2}.
$$
This is a function of ##t## only and does not affect the equations of motion.
 
  • Like
Likes davon806
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top