Lagrangian equation from this free body diagram

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the Lagrangian mechanics equation from a free body diagram involving two wheels with different masses and radii. The key variables include the masses, radii, angles, and angular velocities of both wheels, with specific relationships established between them. The potential energy is identified as V = mgl_{cm}cosθ_{1}, while the kinetic energy incorporates both translational and rotational components. Participants clarify the interaction between the wheels, confirming that the smaller wheel is effectively a motor that turns the larger wheel without slipping. The final goal is to express the Lagrangian as L = T - V by calculating the kinetic energy and potential energy based on the derived positions of the wheels.
Hyperian
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Here's the free body diagram with variables.
txbPQ.png

I am looking for the lagrangian mechanics equation.
M is mass of the bottom wheel.
m is the mass of the top wheel.
R is the radius of the bottom wheel.
r is the radius of the top wheel.
θ_{1} is the angle from vertical of the bottom wheel.
θ_{2} is the angle from vertical of the top wheel.
\dot{θ}_{1} is the angular velocity of the bottom wheel.
\dot{θ}_{2} is the angular velocity of the top wheel.
x is the linear distance.
\dot{θ} is linear velocity of the whole contraption.

Homework Equations


Here are some relationships of these variables according to the free body diagram.
l_{cm}=\frac{m(R+r)}{M+m} is the distance to center of mass from center of the bottom wheel.
\dot{θ}_{1}R=-\dot{θ}_{2}r is just the relationship of the two wheel's angular velocity.
I=\frac{2}{5}MR^{2} is the moment of inertia of the bottom wheel.
I=\frac{1}{4}MR^{2} is the moment of inertia of the top wheel.
\dot{θ}_{1}R=\dot{x} just means that there is no slipping.

I am looking for mechanical Lagrangian equation of L=T-V.
While i know V=mgl_{cm}cosθ_{1}, I am not sure what T would look like, I know it would have to do with at least 2 terms, transitional kinetic energy and rotational energy terms, but I am not sure how the interaction of the two wheels would play out.

The Attempt at a Solution


L=T-mgl_{cm}cosθ_{1}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can the wheel on the bottom slide? Assuming that the small one sticks to the big one (is this OK?), then just write the x, y position of the big one as a function of theta sub one and distance from origin, and write down the position of the small one relative to the big one. Then just add them to get the position w.r.t to the ground, and use this to write the lagrangian.
 
AuraCrystal said:
Can the wheel on the bottom slide? Assuming that the small one sticks to the big one (is this OK?), then just write the x, y position of the big one as a function of theta sub one and distance from origin, and write down the position of the small one relative to the big one. Then just add them to get the position w.r.t to the ground, and use this to write the lagrangian.

the wheel on the bottom does not slide. the small one is actually a motor that turns the big one. so they are stuck together.

I don't get what you mean "and write down the position of the small one relative to the big one. Then just add them to get the position w.r.t to the ground, and use this to write the lagrangian."
 
Ooh ok, then that makes the math simpler. :-) Forget about what I said.

Set the origin to be the center of the wheel. Using basic trig, find the x,y coordinates of the small wheel in terms of theta 1 and theta 2. (The small one can slide, right?) Then plug it into
T_{small}=\frac{1}{2}I \dot{\theta_{1}}+\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}=\frac{1}{2}I \dot{\theta_{1}}+\frac{1}{2}m \left ( \dot{x^{2}} + \dot{y^{2}} \right )
The kinetic energy for the big wheel is easy. Plug those expressions for x and y for the small wheel into V=mgy, then get the Lagrangian.
 
AuraCrystal said:
Ooh ok, then that makes the math simpler. :-) Forget about what I said.

Set the origin to be the center of the wheel. Using basic trig, find the x,y coordinates of the small wheel in terms of theta 1 and theta 2. (The small one can slide, right?) Then plug it into
T_{small}=\frac{1}{2}I \dot{\theta_{1}}+\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}=\frac{1}{2}I \dot{\theta_{1}}+\frac{1}{2}m \left ( \dot{x^{2}} + \dot{y^{2}} \right )
The kinetic energy for the big wheel is easy. Plug those expressions for x and y for the small wheel into V=mgy, then get the Lagrangian.

the small one would kinda be orbiting around the big one, but ideally it should stay pretty much on top of it. this is kind of like a inverted pendulum problem.
so for the small wheel, the transitional motion would be
\frac{1}{2}m((R+r)\dot{θ}cosθ)^2.

you are missing the square on the \dot{θ} on the rotational term right?
 
^Oops! Yeah, I forgot that...
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top