Lagrangian question, inverted pendulum (Very near to the answer)

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



Consider the setup shown in the gure below. The cart of mass M moves along
the (horizontal) x axis. A second mass m is suspended at the end of a rigid, massless
rod of length L. The rod is attached to the cart at point A, and is free to pivot about A in the x-y plane. Frictional forces may be ignored.

72evc1.jpg


Homework Equations



I got the same lagrangian as in wikipedia, so i think it's right.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_pendulum

The Attempt at a Solution



abvekBMO.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your Lagrangian and equations of motions are correct. I'm pretty sure A1 has to be zero so that your solution does not blow up at infinity. Then you can use the initial conditions given in the problem to solve for A2 and A
 
tannerbk said:
Your Lagrangian and equations of motions are correct. I'm pretty sure A1 has to be zero so that your solution does not blow up at infinity. Then you can use the initial conditions given in the problem to solve for A2 and A

I know right? But I can't find any mathematical reason why A1 = 0...I get 2 values of β in the characteristic equation where α = A*exp(βt)..
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top