Lagrangian with a charged, massive vector boson coupled to electromagnetism

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining constraints on constants in a Lagrangian involving a charged, massive vector boson coupled to electromagnetism, emphasizing hermiticity and electromagnetic gauge invariance. Hermiticity requires the coefficients to be real, while gauge invariance introduces additional complexity, particularly in how the fields transform under local U(1) transformations. The interaction terms in the Lagrangian are analyzed, leading to a transformation that incorporates the electromagnetic field. The conversation highlights the need for a "free Lagrangian" and the concept of minimal coupling, which connects the massive vector field to the electromagnetic field through a gauge-covariant derivative. The user seeks clarification on the role of the parameter eta in this context.
jaded2112
Messages
10
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
For this lagrangian, I am trying to find the constraints on the constants##\eta,\kappa, g,\lambda##.
Relevant Equations
$$
\textit{L}=\frac{-1}{4}\rho^\dagger_{\alpha\beta}\rho^{\alpha\beta} - m^2\rho^\dagger_{\alpha}\rho^{\alpha}-ig[(\rho^\dagger_{\alpha\beta}\rho^{\alpha} +\eta\rho_{\alpha\beta}\rho^{\dagger\alpha})A^{\beta}+\kappa\rho^{\dagger}_{\alpha}\rho_{\beta}\textit{F}^{\alpha\beta}+
$$ $$
\frac{\lambda}{m^2}\rho^{\dagger}_{\alpha\beta}\rho^{\beta}_{\sigma}\textit{F}^{\sigma\alpha}]
$$
I need to use hermiticity and electromagnetic gauge invariance to determine the constraints on the constants. Through hermiticity, i found that the coefficients need to be real. However, I am not sure how gauge invariance would come into the picture to give further contraints. I think the ##\rho^{\alpha}## field would go to ##e^{i\theta(x)}\rho^{\alpha}##, and ##\rho_{\alpha\beta} \rightarrow \partial_{\alpha}(e^{i\theta(x)}\rho_{\beta})-\partial_{\beta}(e^{i\theta(x)}\rho_{\alpha})##. So, if we consider the first two terms in the interaction part of the lagrangian, ##-ig(\rho^\dagger_{\alpha\beta}\rho^{\alpha} +\eta\rho_{\alpha\beta}\rho^{\dagger\alpha})A^{\beta}##, and do a local ##U(1)## transformation, we get $$-ig [\rho^{\dagger}_{\alpha\beta}\rho^{\alpha} + \eta\rho_{\alpha\beta}\rho^{\dagger\alpha}+i(\rho^{\dagger}_{\alpha}\rho^{\alpha}-\eta\rho_{\alpha}\rho^{\dagger\alpha})\partial_{\beta}\theta + i\partial_{\alpha}\theta(\eta\rho_{\beta}\rho^{\dagger\alpha}-\rho^{\dagger}_\beta \rho^{\alpha})](A^{\beta}+\partial^{\beta}\theta) $$
After this, I am kind of stuck trying to figure out what eta would be. Any help is appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The usual idea is to write down a "free Lagrangian" of the charged fields, which in your case seems to be the Proca Lagrangian for a massive complex vector field. Then you make the symmetry under multiplication with a phase factor local by introducing the massless em. field as a "connection" to define a gauge-covariant derivative and then write such a covariant derivative instead of a usual partial derivative. This is called "minimal coupling" and is a successful heuristics that lead to the formulation of the Standard Model of elementary particle physics.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top