Lagrangian with a charged, massive vector boson coupled to electromagnetism

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining constraints on constants in a Lagrangian involving a charged, massive vector boson coupled to electromagnetism, emphasizing hermiticity and electromagnetic gauge invariance. Hermiticity requires the coefficients to be real, while gauge invariance introduces additional complexity, particularly in how the fields transform under local U(1) transformations. The interaction terms in the Lagrangian are analyzed, leading to a transformation that incorporates the electromagnetic field. The conversation highlights the need for a "free Lagrangian" and the concept of minimal coupling, which connects the massive vector field to the electromagnetic field through a gauge-covariant derivative. The user seeks clarification on the role of the parameter eta in this context.
jaded2112
Messages
10
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
For this lagrangian, I am trying to find the constraints on the constants##\eta,\kappa, g,\lambda##.
Relevant Equations
$$
\textit{L}=\frac{-1}{4}\rho^\dagger_{\alpha\beta}\rho^{\alpha\beta} - m^2\rho^\dagger_{\alpha}\rho^{\alpha}-ig[(\rho^\dagger_{\alpha\beta}\rho^{\alpha} +\eta\rho_{\alpha\beta}\rho^{\dagger\alpha})A^{\beta}+\kappa\rho^{\dagger}_{\alpha}\rho_{\beta}\textit{F}^{\alpha\beta}+
$$ $$
\frac{\lambda}{m^2}\rho^{\dagger}_{\alpha\beta}\rho^{\beta}_{\sigma}\textit{F}^{\sigma\alpha}]
$$
I need to use hermiticity and electromagnetic gauge invariance to determine the constraints on the constants. Through hermiticity, i found that the coefficients need to be real. However, I am not sure how gauge invariance would come into the picture to give further contraints. I think the ##\rho^{\alpha}## field would go to ##e^{i\theta(x)}\rho^{\alpha}##, and ##\rho_{\alpha\beta} \rightarrow \partial_{\alpha}(e^{i\theta(x)}\rho_{\beta})-\partial_{\beta}(e^{i\theta(x)}\rho_{\alpha})##. So, if we consider the first two terms in the interaction part of the lagrangian, ##-ig(\rho^\dagger_{\alpha\beta}\rho^{\alpha} +\eta\rho_{\alpha\beta}\rho^{\dagger\alpha})A^{\beta}##, and do a local ##U(1)## transformation, we get $$-ig [\rho^{\dagger}_{\alpha\beta}\rho^{\alpha} + \eta\rho_{\alpha\beta}\rho^{\dagger\alpha}+i(\rho^{\dagger}_{\alpha}\rho^{\alpha}-\eta\rho_{\alpha}\rho^{\dagger\alpha})\partial_{\beta}\theta + i\partial_{\alpha}\theta(\eta\rho_{\beta}\rho^{\dagger\alpha}-\rho^{\dagger}_\beta \rho^{\alpha})](A^{\beta}+\partial^{\beta}\theta) $$
After this, I am kind of stuck trying to figure out what eta would be. Any help is appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The usual idea is to write down a "free Lagrangian" of the charged fields, which in your case seems to be the Proca Lagrangian for a massive complex vector field. Then you make the symmetry under multiplication with a phase factor local by introducing the massless em. field as a "connection" to define a gauge-covariant derivative and then write such a covariant derivative instead of a usual partial derivative. This is called "minimal coupling" and is a successful heuristics that lead to the formulation of the Standard Model of elementary particle physics.
 
Thread 'Conducting Sphere and Dipole Problem'
Hi, I'm stuck at this question, please help. Attempt to the Conducting Sphere and Dipole Problem (a) Electric Field and Potential at O due to Induced Charges $$V_O = 0$$ This potential is the sum of the potentials due to the real charges (##+q, -q##) and the induced charges on the sphere. $$V_O = V_{\text{real}} + V_{\text{induced}} = 0$$ - Electric Field at O, ##\vec{E}_O##: Since point O is inside a conductor in electrostatic equilibrium, the electric field there must be zero...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K