Lagrangian with a charged, massive vector boson coupled to electromagnetism

jaded2112
Messages
10
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
For this lagrangian, I am trying to find the constraints on the constants##\eta,\kappa, g,\lambda##.
Relevant Equations
$$
\textit{L}=\frac{-1}{4}\rho^\dagger_{\alpha\beta}\rho^{\alpha\beta} - m^2\rho^\dagger_{\alpha}\rho^{\alpha}-ig[(\rho^\dagger_{\alpha\beta}\rho^{\alpha} +\eta\rho_{\alpha\beta}\rho^{\dagger\alpha})A^{\beta}+\kappa\rho^{\dagger}_{\alpha}\rho_{\beta}\textit{F}^{\alpha\beta}+
$$ $$
\frac{\lambda}{m^2}\rho^{\dagger}_{\alpha\beta}\rho^{\beta}_{\sigma}\textit{F}^{\sigma\alpha}]
$$
I need to use hermiticity and electromagnetic gauge invariance to determine the constraints on the constants. Through hermiticity, i found that the coefficients need to be real. However, I am not sure how gauge invariance would come into the picture to give further contraints. I think the ##\rho^{\alpha}## field would go to ##e^{i\theta(x)}\rho^{\alpha}##, and ##\rho_{\alpha\beta} \rightarrow \partial_{\alpha}(e^{i\theta(x)}\rho_{\beta})-\partial_{\beta}(e^{i\theta(x)}\rho_{\alpha})##. So, if we consider the first two terms in the interaction part of the lagrangian, ##-ig(\rho^\dagger_{\alpha\beta}\rho^{\alpha} +\eta\rho_{\alpha\beta}\rho^{\dagger\alpha})A^{\beta}##, and do a local ##U(1)## transformation, we get $$-ig [\rho^{\dagger}_{\alpha\beta}\rho^{\alpha} + \eta\rho_{\alpha\beta}\rho^{\dagger\alpha}+i(\rho^{\dagger}_{\alpha}\rho^{\alpha}-\eta\rho_{\alpha}\rho^{\dagger\alpha})\partial_{\beta}\theta + i\partial_{\alpha}\theta(\eta\rho_{\beta}\rho^{\dagger\alpha}-\rho^{\dagger}_\beta \rho^{\alpha})](A^{\beta}+\partial^{\beta}\theta) $$
After this, I am kind of stuck trying to figure out what eta would be. Any help is appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The usual idea is to write down a "free Lagrangian" of the charged fields, which in your case seems to be the Proca Lagrangian for a massive complex vector field. Then you make the symmetry under multiplication with a phase factor local by introducing the massless em. field as a "connection" to define a gauge-covariant derivative and then write such a covariant derivative instead of a usual partial derivative. This is called "minimal coupling" and is a successful heuristics that lead to the formulation of the Standard Model of elementary particle physics.
 
##|\Psi|^2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\exp(\frac{-(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##\braket{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,x\exp(-\frac{(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##y=x-x_0 \quad x=y+x_0 \quad dy=dx.## The boundaries remain infinite, I believe. ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dy(y+x_0)\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2}).## ##\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,y\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2})+\frac{2x_0}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,\exp(-\frac{y^2}{b^2}).## I then resolved the two...
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
It's given a gas of particles all identical which has T fixed and spin S. Let's ##g(\epsilon)## the density of orbital states and ##g(\epsilon) = g_0## for ##\forall \epsilon \in [\epsilon_0, \epsilon_1]##, zero otherwise. How to compute the number of accessible quantum states of one particle? This is my attempt, and I suspect that is not good. Let S=0 and then bosons in a system. Simply, if we have the density of orbitals we have to integrate ##g(\epsilon)## and we have...
Back
Top