I Understanding the Development of Laminar Jet Flow - Tips from Experts

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter member 428835
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flow Jet laminar
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the development of laminar jet flow, particularly during the startup phase. Initial models often address steady-state behavior, but the complexities of a jet's startup involve a slug of fluid displacing surrounding fluid and potentially forming a vortex ring. The participants acknowledge that while most literature covers steady behavior, the startup process is less documented and more intricate. There is a recognition that detailed exploration may lead to uncertainties, as jet dynamics can be complex. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for more intuitive insights into the initial behavior of laminar jets.
member 428835
Hi PF!

Can someone help me understand the development of a laminar jet flow? Perhaps @Chestermiller and @boneh3ad have some advice?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's a rather vague question.
 
Sorry, let me be more clear: I've seen basic models that treat laminar jets in a steady state, but what happens when a jet just begins? I'm mostly curious about an intuitive approach and not so much on the math. After seeing you and Chestermiller work I believe you two likely have an idea.
 
Well most texts treat the steady behavior of jets, so that will comprise the bulk of information you would find. The actual startup process is likely to be rather complex and will involve essentially a slug of fluid leaving the orifice and pushing the still fluid out of the way. I'd be willing to bet that it would typically also involve the formation of a vortex ring near that leading slug much like what you can observe with a mushroom cloud, as the shear would be rather large as it penetrates into the surrounding stagnant air.

Other than that, I am not sure what you are seeking here. Jet's aren't exactly something I deal with a lot, though, so if you want to get too much more detailed, I suspect we will quickly reach a point where your guess is as good as mine.
 
  • Like
Likes member 428835
Hey I appreciate your insight! Thanks for taking the time to reply!
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top