Laplce transform for 6t*(u(t)-u(t-1))

  • Thread starter Thread starter rudyx61
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transform
rudyx61
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Im having trouble finding the laplace transfor for the title equation:

6t*(u(t)-u(t-1))

Im not sure how to go about, i was thinking of considering u(t) to be equal to 1 but that seemed a bit of a dodgy thing to do

Any one have any ideas or answers on how i should go about solving this problem

cheers
rudy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, by definition,
L(f(t))= \int_0^\infty e^{-st}f(t)dt
so
L(6t(u(t)- u(t-1))= \int_0^\infty e^{-st}6t(u(t)- u(t-1))dt
= 6\int_0^\infty e^{-st}tu(t)dt- 6\int_0^\infty e^{-st}tu(t-1)dt
The first is a standard integral. For the second, let r= t- 1 so that dt= dr, u(t-1)= u(r), and e^{-st}= e^{-s(r+1)}= e^{-s}e^{-sr}. The integral becomes
6e^{-s}\int_{-1}^\infty e^{-sr}(r+1)u(r)dr
and since the Laplace transform of u(t) only depends on the value of u for positive t, we can assume that u(t)= 0 for t< 0.
 
im not that good at integrating multiple variables so could you tell me how ud integrate the first term?
 
figured it out
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top