Law of conservation of energy problem [reupload]

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a word problem involving a mass hanging from a vertical spring, where a person pulls down on the mass to stretch the spring. Participants debate whether the total mechanical energy of the system remains constant, increases, or decreases, emphasizing the roles of gravitational potential energy and elastic potential energy. It is clarified that the person pulling the mass is not part of the system, which consists solely of the spring and the mass. The key point raised is the need to compare the changes in gravitational potential energy and elastic potential energy to determine the overall energy change. Ultimately, the consensus suggests that gravitational potential energy must be considered in evaluating the total mechanical energy of the system.
Kianlos
Messages
5
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


THIS PROBLEM CONSISTS OF NOTHING MORE THAN WHAT IS BEING STATED (NO VALUES, NO EQUATIONS, NOTHING) THIS IS A WORD PROBLEM WHERE NO CALCULATIONS ARE TO BE MADE: A mass hangs from a vertical spring and is initially at rest. A person then pulls down on the mass, stretching the spring. Does the total mechanical energy of this system increase, decrease or stay the same? Explain.

Homework Equations


none

The Attempt at a Solution


So what i said was the total mechanical energy of the system is constant, meaning that it stays the same (I believe this is so because one is decreasing the gravitational potential energy of the body whilst increasing the elastic potential energy such that the total mechanical energy is kept constant)

Is that right? If not, please explain to me where my interpretation of the problem has come to faults with the correct answer
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Kianlos.

Is the person who pulls down on the spring considered to be part of the system? Where did the energy come from for him to pull down the spring? It wasn't potential energy already associated with the rock, otherwise the rock would have stretched the spring further.

If the person let's go of the spring after stretching it, what happens? Would the rock return to its previous rest position and stop there?
 
gneill said:
Hi Kianlos.

Is the person who pulls down on the spring considered to be part of the system? Where did the energy come from for him to pull down the spring? It wasn't potential energy already associated with the rock, otherwise the rock would have stretched the spring further.

If the person let's go of the spring after stretching it, what happens? Would the rock return to its previous rest position and stop there?
The person who pulls down on the spring is considered not to be part of the system (the system only consists of the spring and the mass)... Okay, if it wasn't potential energy already associated with the rock then can I just go on to say that the total mechanical energy of this system increases instead? I say this because if the object is initially at rest and we are not to factor in gravitational potential energy and are to pull upon the said object bringing about some form of stretch, is it just safe to say that the total mechanical energy of the system increases?
 
Kianlos said:
The person who pulls down on the spring is considered not to be part of the system (the system only consists of the spring and the mass)... Okay, if it wasn't potential energy already associated with the rock then can I just go on to say that the total mechanical energy of this system increases instead? I say this because if the object is initially at rest and we are not to factor in gravitational potential energy and are to pull upon the said object bringing about some form of stretch, is it just safe to say that the total mechanical energy of the system increases?
Gravitational potential energy is a factor. What @gneill and @Kianlos are trying to get you to consider is whether the change in gravitational potential energy is the same, greater than or less than the change in potential energy in the spring.
 
  • Like
Likes gneill
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top