Law of continuity problem in fluids

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses the law of continuity in fluids, which states that fluid velocity is inversely proportional to the cross-sectional area, applicable primarily to incompressible fluids. When a hose is partially blocked, water exits at a higher velocity, consistent with this law. However, when a tap is partially closed, the water velocity decreases despite a reduced area, which seems contradictory. This discrepancy arises because the tap's valve design introduces compressibility into the flow, affecting the velocity. Thus, the law of continuity does not fully explain the behavior of fluids in scenarios involving compressible flow.
Dingu Sagar
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
When a hose with running water is partially blocked with our finger ,the water comes out with a greater velocity. This is in agreement with the law of continuity in fluids which states that velocity of fluid is inversely proportional to the area of cross section.

But when a running tap is closed partially , the water velocity decreases even though the area has been reduced by the tap. Why is the phenomenon not explainable by the above law ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dingu Sagar said:
When a hose with running water is partially blocked with our finger ,the water comes out with a greater velocity. This is in agreement with the law of continuity in fluids which states that velocity of fluid is inversely proportional to the area of cross section.
The law of continuity doesn't state that exactly. What is marked in bold is true only if the flow of fluid is incompressible i.e the fluid density remains constant with respect to time.

But when a running tap is closed partially , the water velocity decreases even though the area has been reduced by the tap. Why is the phenomenon not explainable by the above law ?
That happens because the valve in the tap is designed in such a way as to make the flow compressible .
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Back
Top