Solving for Guy Wires using the Law of Cosines - 100ft Tower on a Hill

  • Thread starter Thread starter gabrielh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
AI Thread Summary
A 100-foot tower is to be erected on a hill with a 6-degree slope, requiring the calculation of two guy wire lengths anchored 65 feet uphill and downhill from the base. The Law of Cosines is identified as the appropriate method for solving the problem, with discussions around the assumption that the tower is vertical. Participants suggest creating two triangles to analyze the situation, considering the elevation angle of the hill. There is consensus that using the Law of Cosines is more straightforward than employing the Law of Sines, which would complicate the calculations. The discussion emphasizes confirming angles and applying the Law of Cosines effectively to find the solution.
gabrielh
Messages
79
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 100-foot vertical tower is to be erected on the side of a hill that makes a 6^{\circ} angle with the horizontal. Find the length of each of the two guy wires that will be anchored 65 feet uphill and downhill from the base of the tower.

Homework Equations


Law of Cosines

a^{2} = b^{2} + c^{2} - (2bc)cos(a)
b^{2} = a^{2} + c^{2} - (2ac)cos(b)
c^{2} = a^{2} + b^{2} - (2ab)cos(c)

I included an sketched version of the image that was provided with this problem. Please forgive the sub par drawing skills.

The Attempt at a Solution


With a bit of help getting started and finding a couple of the unknown angles, I should be able to work this problem easily. I understand law of cosines quite well, I'm just unsure of the best way to begin this problem.
 

Attachments

  • trigproblem1.jpg
    trigproblem1.jpg
    21.1 KB · Views: 409
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmmm... You could try splitting your building in half and creating two triangles.

Is it safe to assume the building is perpendicular to the plane?
 
jegues said:
Hmmm... You could try splitting your building in half and creating two triangles.

Is it safe to assume the building is perpendicular to the plane?

I'm not sure. That image and the problem statement is all I've been given.
 
Well in the image, is the building going striaght up vertically? Or is it tilted a bit, vertical to the plane?
 
jegues said:
Well in the image, is the building going striaght up vertically? Or is it tilted a bit, vertical to the plane?

Straight up vertically I believe would be safe to assume.
 
Well if the plane on which the structure stood was flat, then we could say that the angle in each triangle is simply 90, but since the plane is elevated by 6 degrees we can see that first triangle is going to take the 6 degree elevation and the second triangle will lose 6 degrees.

That should be enough to apply law of cosine or even use sine law to solve everything.

EDIT: That's just my thought process, I'd like someone to confrim my thoughts ;)
 
Yes that's how you'll find the angles between the tower and the cliff sloping up and down. But this is a cosine law problem, using the sine law will be quite more difficult and unnecessary since you'll have to find another angle in each triangle.
 
this is a cosine law problem, using the sine law will be quite more difficult and unnecessary since you'll have to find another angle in each triangle.

I agree the cosine law would be the better route to take in solving this problem.
 
Thanks for the help :)
 
Back
Top