Leakage Resistance of 100pF Capacitor with Mica Dielectric

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the leakage resistance of a 100pF capacitor with a mica dielectric. The relevant formulas for capacitance and resistance are provided, with capacitance depending on the relative permittivity and area, and resistance based on resistivity and dimensions. An initial calculation yields a resistance of 1.2 x 10^25 Ohm, but a correction highlights the omission of vacuum permittivity in the capacitance formula. The importance of unit consistency is emphasized, leading to a more accurate understanding of the capacitor's leakage resistance. Accurate calculations are crucial for evaluating the performance of capacitors with leaky dielectrics.
Kev1n
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A non ideal capacitor having a 'leaky' dielectric where RL is the leakage resistance measured across the dielectric. A 100pF parallel plate capacitor has a mica dielectric of relative permittivelty Er = 12 and resistivity of p = 1014 ohm m.
Calculate the leakage resistance of this capacitor





2. C = Er A/d & R = p d/A



3. Ans
C = 100 pF, resistivity = 1014 ohm m
Er = 12
C = Er A/d ---- (1)
where A is the area of cross section of the plate and d is the distance between the plates ( or the length of the dielectric)
R = p d/A ----(2)
From (1), d/A = Er/C = 12/(100 x 10-12) = 12 x 1010
Substituting in (2)
R = 1014 x 12 x 1010
Or R = 12 x 1024 Ohm
Or R = 1.2 x 1025 Ohm

The Equation seems right however answer looks wrong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have the right idea. However, in the formula for the capacitance you are missing the vacuum permittivity E_0 = 8.85419 * 10^-12 F/m

C = E_0 E_r A/d

Always check your units!
 
Roger, of course - thanks for pointing that out, appreciated
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top