Learning outside of the classroom

  • Thread starter Thread starter bigaggie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classroom Outside
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the motivation for continuous learning among engineers after graduation. Participants emphasize the necessity of self-directed study and professional development, often driven by the demands of their jobs. Engineers frequently reference books to refresh their knowledge and learn new material, as it's impractical to remember every formula. The conversation highlights the types of reference materials used, noting that while some books provide theoretical insights, many are practical handbooks or catalogs focused on specific engineering applications. Individual learning needs dictate the choice of reading materials, with examples like Palmgren's Ball and Roller Bearing Engineering and the Bodine Small Motor, Gearmotor, and Control Handbook mentioned as relevant resources.
bigaggie
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
So I have this question, and while I may not be in a position to apply it now, it is something I'm curious about. But for you guys who've already graduated and are engineers and have been for some time, how do you motivate yourself to keep learning? What sources do you utilize for these purposes? I just have a hard time visualizing anyone reading a textbook without someone forcing them to.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You find your limitations when you work in a job. You then decide to professionally develop yourself; the methods can generally be self-directed study, or attending more coursework.
 
bigaggie said:
So I have this question, and while I may not be in a position to apply it now, it is something I'm curious about. But for you guys who've already graduated and are engineers and have been for some time, how do you motivate yourself to keep learning? What sources do you utilize for these purposes? I just have a hard time visualizing anyone reading a textbook without someone forcing them to.

I generally find that I'm the one forcing me to read!

Once you start working, and assuming you want to actually do a good job, you'll find that you must read books (typically reference books) to do your job. You are not going to remember every formula you learned so you'll need a reference at the least for that.

As far as learning new material...it goes back to you have the desire.

CS
 
What kind of reference books would you be reading as engineers? They're not like theory-laden textbooks of engineering courses but more of dry engineering catalog specifications or operating manual types right?
 
Defennnder said:
What kind of reference books would you be reading as engineers? They're not like theory-laden textbooks of engineering courses but more of dry engineering catalog specifications or operating manual types right?

Yes and no. A lot handbooks offer a brief theoretical overview of what the formulas actually mean, or derive a simple case. Sometimes they do offer a bit more of the theory, it just depends on the book and if the subuject warrants more of an explanation.

Catalogs are just that...catalogs.

I've never seen an operating manual with any kind of theory in it.

CS
 
Right now I'm reading Palmgren's Ball and Roller Bearing Engineering. Last week it was the Bodine Small Motor, Gearmotor, and Control Handbook. For me, it almost always depends on what I need to know at that point in time or what's new that I might have some use for.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
71
Views
701
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Back
Top