Length Contraction of Particles & Photons in Relativity

pieterdb
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to teach myself special relativity. I use the book 'Introduction to Special Relativity' by Wolfgang Rindler. I have a question about length contraction.

We consider 2 particles traveling along the x-axis of a reference frame S with a constant distance between them. We can always go to the rest frame of the particles. If the distance between the particles as seen from their rest frame is L_0, then the distance between the particles as seen from any other inertial frame moving with a velocity v in the direction of the x-axis of S is calculated by L = L_0 / gamma. This length contraction formula originates in the relativity of simultaneity.

If we now replace the 2 particles by 2 photons, it is no longer possible to go to the rest frame of the photons (since the speed of light is c in every inertial frames). Likewise it is impossible to calculate the distance between the photons as seen from another reference frame with the length contraction formula, since gamma always leads to a division by zero.

So apparently there is a difference between the length contraction of the distance between two particles and the length contraction of the distance between 2 moving photons. I guess the 2 moving photons are the limiting case ?

I don't understand this. Is there a length contraction for the distance between 2 moving photons or is this distance the same in all inertial frames (I guess there should be a length contraction since the relativity of simultaneity) ? If yes, how can we calculate this length contraction ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pieterdb said:
If we now replace the 2 particles by 2 photons, it is no longer possible to go to the rest frame of the photons (since the speed of light is c in every inertial frames). Likewise it is impossible to calculate the distance between the photons as seen from another reference frame with the length contraction formula, since gamma always leads to a division by zero.
When you calculate how something is seen from another (inertial) reference frame, the gamma factor is the one defined by the velocity difference between the two frames. In this case however, since the two objects that have constant velocity in the first frame aren't at rest in the other frame, you can't just use the Length contraction formula. You should start by drawing the world lines of the photons in a spacetime diagram, and then draw a simultaneity line for the frame that you going to transform to. Check where it intersects the world lines of the photons. You need to determine the coordinates of these two events in both frames. When you've done that, it shouldn't be hard to find the distance between the photons in the other frame.
 
Thx, I understand it now.The motion of a photon seen from S is given by :

x = x0 + ctUsing the standard Lorentz Transformation formulas, I can express the motion of a photon seen from S' by :

x' = \gammax0 + \gamma(c-v)(t'/\gamma(1-v/c) + vx0/c2(1-v/c))This eventually leads to the distance between the 2 photons seen from S' :

L' = L (c+v)1/2(c-v)-1/2
 

Attachments

  • spaceTime.jpeg
    spaceTime.jpeg
    8.8 KB · Views: 494
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
54
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
52
Views
5K
Replies
101
Views
6K
Back
Top