Why Does Length Contraction Affect Only Dimensions Parallel to Motion?

AI Thread Summary
Length contraction occurs only in dimensions parallel to motion due to the relativity of simultaneity, which affects how distances are measured in different frames of reference. When measuring length, two events must be simultaneous in the observer's frame, but this simultaneity is altered for events along the direction of motion. In contrast, events occurring perpendicular to the motion remain simultaneous across different frames, leading to no contraction in those dimensions. The fundamental principle is that only the lengths parallel to the direction of travel experience contraction because of the differing perceptions of simultaneity. Thus, lengths perpendicular to motion remain unchanged.
georgeh
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
I have a h.w. problem that states:
Explain WHY only the lengths parallel to motion shrink and why lengths perpendicular don't shrink.

I know that the vector component of the velocity for an object moving in straight line would be changing. This change only occurs on the x-axis and the not the y. But i am not sure how to extrapolate from that, Or i may be heading the wrong direction
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From your question, I am assuming that you already understand why lengths parallel to motion shrink... and the issue is why just the parallel length and not the perpendicular lengths.

Assume horizontal motion on this page.
Consider two aligned vertically-oriented metersticks, call them A on the left and B on the right, with different horizontal velocities, approaching each other ...with nails at each end of their metersticks intended to scrape the other meterstick as they pass.

Study the problem from A's inertial frame.
Make your assumption about what should happen.
Then study from B's inertial frame.
 
I'm not sure what your teacher wants, but I would find the velocity perpendicular to the motion (v=0), and then use that value to calculate the perpendicular length contraction. You might get more credit if you use robphy's method though.
 
Last edited:
georgeh said:
I have a h.w. problem that states:
Explain WHY only the lengths parallel to motion shrink and why lengths perpendicular don't shrink.

I know that the vector component of the velocity for an object moving in straight line would be changing. This change only occurs on the x-axis and the not the y. But i am not sure how to extrapolate from that, Or i may be heading the wrong direction
This is a good question. It brings out the fundmental reason for length contraction: Length measurement depends on simultanaeity of events (ie. where the ends are at a particular time).

Two events are required to measure length. These are necessarily simultaneous in the measuring frame. If the same events are not simultaneous in the frame of reference of the object being measured, the measurements of length will differ.

Events that occur simultaneously in the moving frame in positions separated by a distance perpendicular to the direction of travel will be perceived by an observer in the rest frame to be simultaneous also. This is because light signals from those points that are received simultaneously by an observer in the moving frame who is equidistant from those points will reach the rest observer who is equidistant from those points also at the same time.

However, events that occur simultaneouisly in the moving frame in positions separated by a distance parallel to the direction of travel will not be perceived by an observer in the rest frame to be simultaneous (the classic Einstein moving train gedanken experiment).

Because simultanaeity differs only for events separated by a distance in the direction of travel, measurement of distance will differ only for distances parallel to the direction of travel.

AM
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top