B Length Contraction Thought Experiment: Spot Mistake/Wrong Assumption

galm_2727
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
I was trying to come up with a thought experiment for showing the length contraction, but I'm not getting the correct expression and I can't see where is the mistake.
Alice travels in a spaceship, which she measures to be L. The spaceship is moving with velocity v relatively to Bob. Alice makes a light beam traveling along the spaceship and measures the time interval it takes to go from one end to another, ΔtA.

So, equation (1): L = c × ΔtA

From Bob's point of view, the light beam will take a time ΔtB and the length of the spaceship will be:

L' = c × ΔtB - v × ΔtB = (1 - β) × c ΔtB

But ΔtB = ϒ ΔtA. Therefore:

L' = (1 - β) ϒ c ΔtA

Using (1), we have:

L' = (1 - β)1/2 / (1 + β)1/2 L

Could you help me spot my mistake/wrong assumption?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
galm_2727 said:
But ΔtB = ϒ ΔtA.
Here is the mistake. This formula does not apply here.

I recommend against using the simplified length contraction and time dilation formulas for exactly this reason. I recommend using the full Lorentz transform instead. That will automatically simplify when appropriate, but will avoid mistakes like this.
 
  • Like
Likes Pencilvester, vanhees71 and galm_2727
As Dale says, you can't naively use the time dilation formula here - doing so neglects the relativity of simultaneity. You need to use the full Lorentz transforms.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, Dale and galm_2727
Dale said:
Here is the mistake. This formula does not apply here.

I recommend against using the simplified length contraction and time dilation formulas for exactly this reason. I recommend using the full Lorentz transform instead. That will automatically simplify when appropriate, but will avoid mistakes like this.
Thank you.
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
galm_2727 said:
From Bob's point of view, the light beam will take a time ΔtB and the length of the spaceship will be:
If light is traveling in the same direction as the ship (toward the front) then t = LB/(c-v).
If light is traveling toward the back of the ship, t = LB/(c+v)
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Back
Top