Find Final Image Location & Magnification in Lens Combination 21

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shackleford
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Combination Lens
AI Thread Summary
Two converging lenses with a focal length of 25 cm are positioned 16.5 cm apart, with an object placed 35 cm in front of the first lens. The image formed by the first lens serves as a virtual object for the second lens, resulting in a negative object distance for the second lens. Calculating with the thin lens equation yields an image distance of 0.1848 m for the second lens, indicating the final image is located to the right of it. The discussion highlights that a positive image distance signifies a real image, while a negative object distance confirms the virtual nature of the object for the second lens. The complexity of incorporating the second lens into the ray diagram is acknowledged as a source of confusion.
Shackleford
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
2
21. Two 25cm focal length converging lenses are placed 16.5cm apart. An object is placed 35cm in front of one lens. Where will the final image formed by the second lens be located? What is the total magnification?

HERE IS WHAT I NEED CHECKED. Because the image formed by the first lens is on the opposite side of the second lens from where the light is emanating (right side of second lens), I give the new object distance for the second lens a negative sign. Plugging those numbers into the thin lens equation, I get an image distance of .1848 m. This has a positive sign because it is on the opposite side from where the light is originally emanating.

21.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Shackleford,

Shackleford said:
HERE IS WHAT I NEED CHECKED. Because the image formed by the first lens is on the opposite side of the second lens from where the light is emanating (right side of second lens), I give the new object distance for the second lens a negative sign.

Yes, that's right; it will be a virtual object and the object distance for the second lens will be negative.

Plugging those numbers into the thin lens equation, I get an image distance of .1848 m. This has a positive sign because it is on the opposite side from where the light is originally emanating.

Yes, a positive image distance for the final lens means here that the final image will be to the right of the second lens.
 
alphysicist said:
Hi Shackleford,
Yes, that's right; it will be a virtual object and the object distance for the second lens will be negative.
Yes, a positive image distance for the final lens means here that the final image will be to the right of the second lens.

The book says image distance is positive for a real image and negative for a virtual image. The image distance for the first lens is positive. Wouldn't that make it a real image since the rays do pass through the point? The image distance is also positive for the second lens.

How do you draw the ray diagram to get everything in its proper analytical spot? I think incorporating the second lens is confusing me a bit in this regard.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top