How Does Lenz's Law Cause an Aluminum Ring to Levitate?

AI Thread Summary
Lenz's Law describes how an induced electromotive force (EMF) generates a current that opposes the change in magnetic flux, which is crucial for understanding the levitation of an aluminum ring on an iron pole. The experiment demonstrates electromagnetic induction, where the changing magnetic field creates eddy currents in the aluminum ring, producing a magnetic field that repels the pole. Resources like HyperPhysics provide detailed explanations of Lenz's Law and its relationship with Faraday's Law, which may be beneficial for further research. Consulting a physics textbook can also offer foundational insights into these concepts. Understanding these principles will enhance the experiment's theoretical framework and documentation.
vengefuldeath87
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
im working on a lenz's law experiment where i am making an aluminum ring levitate on an iron pole, but I am not sure of the theory behind how it works, and what i should be writing about. any suggestions welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top